2008470 | thinkbank.online | Think Mutual Bank | JESUS RIESCO MILLA | UDRP | 23-Sep-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
2008845 | vacacionesdisney.com | Disney Enterprises, Inc. | Dueño Carlo Piccini Meza / Renacteur, S.A. de C.V. | UDRP | 22-Sep-2022 |
of a given case including passive holding in making its bad faith analysis. See Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows Case No D2000-0003 WIPO Feb 18 2000 after considering all the circumstances of a given case it is possible that |
|
2008452 | sulllcrom.com | Sullivan & Cromwell LLP | Ashley Dye | UDRP | 22-Sep-2022 |
the trade mark of another Passive holding of a domain name containing a mark with a reputation can be bad faith registration and use See Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows D2000-0003 WIPO Feb 18 2000 As such the Panel holds |
|
2009269 | e-tradesfx.com | E*Trade Financial Holdings, LLC | Mike omyer | UDRP | 20-Sep-2022 |
DECISION E Trade Financial Holdings LLC v Mike omyer Claim Number FA2208002009269 PARTIES Complainant is E Trade Financial Holdings LLC Complainant represented by Eric J Shimanoff of Cowan Liebowitz & Latman P.C New York USA. Respondent is |
|
2009483 | northstarmovingllc.com | NorthStar Moving Holding Company | Diseno Web | UDRP | 19-Sep-2022 |
DECISION NorthStar Moving Holding Company v Diseno Web Claim Number FA2208002009483 PARTIES Complainant is NorthStar Moving Holding Company Complainant represented by Deborah A Gubernick of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P California USA. Respondent is |
|
2008680 | toycta-europe.com | Toyota Motor Corporation | Todd Hunter | UDRP | 15-Sep-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
2007571 | bitmex1.xyz | HDR Global Trading Limited | Jacob Tan Zhang En, Perfso Technology | UDRP | 14-Sep-2022 |
domain name resolves to a passive landing page that states This site can't be reached bitmex1.xyz's server IP address could not be found On March 10 2022 and again on March 30 2022 Complainant attempted to contact Respondent to resolve this |
|
2008208 | taboola.host | Taboola.com Ltd. | jiang zan | UDRP | 13-Sep-2022 |
search services is being passively held with a limited holding page without any explanation causing disruption to the Complainant's business TABOOLA is distinctive and not a descriptive term The overriding objective of the Policy is to curb |
|
2006834 | marinaabaysands.commarinabaysandco.commarinabaysands-sgp.commarinabaysands.shop marinabaysandssales.com marinabaysandz.com marinebaysands.com [4 MORE] | Las Vegas Sands Corp. | hu luo / lewansi / theones | UDRP | 13-Sep-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
2008197 | abbvle.net | AbbVie, Inc. | Allergan AR | UDRP | 12-Sep-2022 |
could be used to deceive Passive holding of a domain name containing a sign confusingly similar to a famous mark disrupts the Complainant's business and is opportunistic registration and use in bad faith Typosquatting and causing confusion by |
|
2006833 | morqanstanley.cam | Morgan Stanley | Andrew Pet / Murry Law | UDRP | 29-Aug-2022 |
is confusing and disruptive Passive holding of a mark with a reputation is registration and use in bad faith also B Respondent Respondent failed to submit a Response in this proceeding FINDINGS The Complainant is the owner of the MORGAN |
|
2006430 | airdna.com | AirDNA, LLC | ding zhi qiang / bei jing yi rui sheng wu ji shu you xian gong si | UDRP | 29-Aug-2022 |
fair use Rather Respondent is passively holding the domain name which does not resolve to an active website Because Respondent's information is not publicly available Complainant does not have information regarding the date of registration of the |
|
2005856 | cp-morganstanley.com noreply-morganstanley.com | Morgan Stanley | Joseph Heard / Eula Fox | UDRP | 26-Aug-2022 |
each at-issue domain name passively. Respondent's passive holding of the confusingly similar at-issue domain names indicates Respondent's bad faith registration and use of such domain names under Policy ¶ 4 a iii See VideoLink Inc v Xantech |
|
2004697 | nutramaxwell.com | Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. | Celine / NUTRAMAXWELL NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. | UDRP | 22-Aug-2022 |
way that there may be passive holding in bad faith. The Panel finds that Complainant has failed to establish that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith DECISION Having failed to establish one of the three elements required |
|
2004692 | marlbororeds.net | PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. | Leighton Stollard / SuperMega | UDRP | 22-Aug-2022 |
domain name and that such passive use does not constitute either a use in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate non-commercial or fair use It is of course well-established that passive holding of a domain |
|
2004363 | emersonokta.com | Emerson Electric Co. | Domain Admin / Domain Privacy Guard Sociedad Anónima Ltd | UDRP | 19-Aug-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
104709 | arcelormittal-associates.com | ARCELORMITTAL (SA) | Anonymous Anonymous | | 19-Aug-2022 |
name is inactive and such passive holding is an indication of bad faith in the circumstances of this case As has been considered by past UDRP panels in similar cases Panels have considered a number of factors when applying the passive holding |
|
2005529 | bitmexfinance.com | HDR Global Trading Limited | maurice leonard, book fandation | UDRP | 18-Aug-2022 |
the Panel finds Respondent's passive holding of the domain name satisfies the requirement of paragraph 4 a iii that the bitmex.site domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith by Respondent In addition referring again to the screen |
|
104716 | arla-international.com | Arla Foods Amba | Saeed Hernandez | | 18-Aug-2022 |
the registration and passive holding of a domain name which has no other legitimate use and clearly refers to the Complainant's trademark may constitute registration and use in bad faith see Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear |
|
104671 | adeccousainc.com | Adecco Group AG | Liquine Services | | 17-Aug-2022 |
been in bad faith Also the passive holding of the disputed domain name without resolving to an active website and with presumed knowledge of the corresponding trademark rights of the Complainant indicates that the Respondent has registered and |
|
104717 | arcelomittalsa.com | ARCELORMITTAL (SA) | Bestinrnarknet | | 17-Aug-2022 |
domain name as well as the passive holding of the disputed domain name all show that the Respondent has registered and used the disputed domain name in bad faith In lack of any Response from the Respondent or any other information indicating the |
|
2005226 | ditchwitch-iowa.com | The Charles Machine Works, Inc. | mvgwdbdmi mvgwdbdmi | UDRP | 16-Aug-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
2004766 | lockheedmartin-engineering.com | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Stephen Wilson | UDRP | 16-Aug-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or |
|
104728 | microsoft800.com | Microsoft Corporation | qian su | | 16-Aug-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or |
|
2005023 | abbivve.com | AbbVie Inc. | Zeddicus Zedd | UDRP | 15-Aug-2022 |
2018 finding the Respondent's passive holding of abbvie-jp.com constituted bad faith under the Policy Microsoft Corporation v zaberis FA 1631367 Forum Sept 2 2015 finding that the passive holding of the domain name combined with Microsoft's good |
|
2004840 | morganstanley-bonds.com morganstanleybonds.com | Morgan Stanley | Host Master / 1337 Services LLC | UDRP | 15-Aug-2022 |
each at-issue domain name passively. Respondent's passive holding of the confusingly similar at-issue domain names indicates Respondent's bad faith registration and use of such domain names under Policy ¶ 4 a iii See VideoLink Inc v Xantech |
|
2004853 | cboermc.com | Cboe Exchange, Inc. | \ucc3d\ud604 \uc774 | UDRP | 15-Aug-2022 |
the trade mark of another Passive holding of a domain name containing a mark with a reputation can be bad faith registration and use See Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows D2000-0003 WIPO Feb 18 2000 Further Respondent has |
|
2000357 | medicalert.africa | MedicAlert Foundation United States, Inc. | ZA Domains / ZA Domains PTY LTD | UDRP | 15-Aug-2022 |
of a given case including passive holding in making its bad faith analysis. See Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows Case No D2000-0003 WIPO Feb 18 2000 after considering all the circumstances of a given case it is possible that |
|
104656 | alrlafoods.com | Arla Foods Amba | Xong Vang | | 15-Aug-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding Previously panels stated the following The Panel established that the registration and passive holding of a domain name which has no other legitimate use and clearly refers to the Complainant's |
|
104705 | arcelormittal-limited.com arcelormittal-limited.net | ARCELORMITTAL (SA) | Fastloc Inc | | 12-Aug-2022 |
It is commonly referred to as passive holding Whilst it is true that the passive holding of a domain name may in appropriate circumstances be indicative of bad faith It will only be so indicative when all the circumstances of the Respondent's |
|
2004784 | statefarmev.com | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Richard Gleba | UDRP | 11-Aug-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
104679 | 4505.com | ASOS plc | MANZU WANG | | 11-Aug-2022 |
parking pages or blank pages passive holding which is sufficient to demonstrate bad faith use Passive holding of a domain name can be bad faith when the Complainant s mark has a strong reputation and the Respondent has provided no evidence of any |
|
104696 | lovehoneygroup.net | Lovehoney Group Limited  | Amanda Lee | | 10-Aug-2022 |
this Panel equivalent to The Passive Holding Doctrine Point 3.3 of the WIPO Jurisprudential Overview 3.0 has established in relation to the Passive Holding Doctrine that From the inception of the UDRP panelists have found that the non-use of a |
|
104708 | isabelmarantfr.com | IM PRODUCTION | Fengshuying Feng | | 08-Aug-2022 |
contact the trade mark holder passive holding does not as such prevent a finding of bad faith The panel must examine all the circumstances of the case to determine whether the respondent is acting in bad faith Examples of what may be cumulative |
|
2003168 | dellvip.com | Dell Inc. | Fu Jian Zhou / Cheng Du Si Wei De Li Ke Ji You Xian Gong Si | UDRP | 05-Aug-2022 |
details This is effectively passive use and not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate non commercial fair use of the Domain Name Passive use in these circumstances is bad faith B Respondent Respondent failed to submit a |
|
2003497 | thoughtworks.store | Thoughtworks, Inc. | Shield Whois | URS | 05-Aug-2022 |
could be put and so finds passive holding and ‘use in bad faith DETERMINATION After reviewing the Complainant's submissions the Examiner determines that the Complainant has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and |
|
2003469 | e-tradefinancial.com | E*Trade Financial Holdings, LLC | Bharat Pateliya / E-TRADE FINANCIAL PVT. LTD. | UDRP | 03-Aug-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
104645 | migrosbank-ag.com | MIGROS-GENOSSENSCHAFTS-BUND | Gray Hunt | | 03-Aug-2022 |
use under the doctrine of passive holding if certain circumstances are met The Panel finds that on the balance of probabilities it can be presumed that the Respondent had actual knowledge of the existence of the Complainant and its activities |
|
2004007 | bnpparibas.top bnpparibasfortis.top | BNP PARIBAS | å¼ æœ‹ et al. | URS | 02-Aug-2022 |
Examiner observes that the passive holding of a domain name does not necessarily circumvent a finding that the domain name is being used in bad faith Given the circumstances that i Complainant is known as one of the most famous banks in the |
|
104689 | corporate-mi-intesasanpaolo.com | Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A. | DANILO PISCHIUTTA | | 02-Aug-2022 |
decisions confirmed that the passive holding of a domain name with knowledge that the domain name infringes another party s trademark rights is evidence of bad faith registration and use see in this regard Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear |
|
2002667 | bloomberginc.org | Bloomberg Finance L.P. | Ivan Ivanov | UDRP | 01-Aug-2022 |
to an inactive web site. Passive holding of a domain name is evidence of bad faith. This may not fit within any of the circumstances described in Policy ¶ 4 b but that paragraph recognizes that mischief can assume many different forms and |
|
2002686 | wanderlistofficial.com | Virtuoso, Ltd. | Cru Eaton | UDRP | 01-Aug-2022 |
of a given case including passive holding in making its bad faith analysis. See Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows Case No D2000-0003 WIPO Feb 18 2000 after considering all the circumstances of a given case it is possible that |
|
2001707 | cboebiz.com cboeep.com cboepws.com | Cboe Exchange, Inc. | main main / main | UDRP | 01-Aug-2022 |
non-use constitutes so-called passive holding in bad faith. Complainant has attempted neither and so the Panel must find that the Complaint has not been established with respect to the cboepws.com domain name. DECISION Having established all |
|
2001175 | gear-wrench.com | Apex Brands, Inc. | Chen xiansheng / chenxiansheng | UDRP | 01-Aug-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
2002681 | bloombergdesignxchange.com | Bloomberg Finance L.P. | Bloomberg Currie / Currie Creed | UDRP | 29-Jul-2022 |
The Panel observes that the passive holding of a domain name does not necessarily circumvent a finding that the domain name is being used in bad faith within the requirements of paragraph 4 a iii of the Policy. See Telstra Corporation Limited v |
|
2000343 | huntsmangroups.com | Huntsman International LLC | Ronald Mawejje | UDRP | 29-Jul-2022 |
and the Panel rejects the passive holding argument Taking into account the factors first discussed above however the evidence furnished by Complainant establishes the required prima facie case. On that evidence and in the absence of any |
|
104654 | de-arcelormittal.com | ARCELORMITTAL (SA) | ArcelorMittal Germany Holding GmbH | | 28-Jul-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panellists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
104676 | altarea-gestion.com | ALTAREA | Redacted for privacy | | 28-Jul-2022 |
The disputed domain name is passively held at the time of the filing of the Complaint Such passive holding does not prevent bad faith use of the disputed domain name in circumstances where the disputed domain name is identical to the |
|
2000776 | guess-work.com | Guess? IP Holder L.P. and Guess?, Inc. | Luke Guess / Guesswork | UDRP | 27-Jul-2022 |
true of intellectual property holding companies and their corporate parents. Guess IP Holder L.P and Guess Inc v New Ventures Services Corp FA1901001825019 Forum Feb 10 2019 Complainant Guess IP Holder is a holding company concerned with |
|
2002666 | bloombergnewsagency.com | Bloomberg Finance L.P. | Garry Porter / Upwork | UDRP | 26-Jul-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
2000409 | bunqe.com | Bunge Limited | Ruiz Romero / Zinco Business Solutions | UDRP | 26-Jul-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or |
|
2002105 | wellsfargotracer.us | Wells Fargo & Company | Domain Administrator / Wells Fargo Company | UDRP | 25-Jul-2022 |
to an inactive website. Passive holding of a domain name is evidence of bad faith. This may not fit within any of the circumstances described in Policy ¶ 4 b but that paragraph recognizes that mischief can assume many different forms and |
|
2001219 | dorseywhitneylaw.com | Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Brown Firm | UDRP | 25-Jul-2022 |
the at-issue domain name passively Browsing to dorseywhitneylaw.com returns a system error message Respondent's passive holding of the at-issue domain name is not indicative of a bona fide offering of goods or services under Policy ¶ 4 c i nor |
|
1999970 | cboeanc.comcboeapp.comcboefis.comcboeidn.com cboelua.com cboerad.com [3 MORE] | Cboe Exchange, Inc. | main main / main | UDRP | 25-Jul-2022 |
The Panel observes that the passive holding of a domain name does not necessarily circumvent a finding that the domain name is being used in bad faith within the requirements of paragraph 4 a iii of the Policy. See Telstra Corporation Limited v |
|
104644 | identification-boursorama.com | BOURSORAMA SA | Anonymize, Inc. | | 25-Jul-2022 |
domain name in this case is passively held but for no conceivably lawful use Telstra supra also National Football League v Thomas Trainer D2006-1440 WIPO December 29 2006 nflnetwork.com holding that when a registrant such as respondent here |
|
2002182 | statefarminsrance.org | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Richard Wilson / state farm insurance | UDRP | 21-Jul-2022 |
Domain Name has not been used Passive holding can evidence registration and use in bad faith under the Policy in these circumstances See Indiana University v Ryan G Foo / PPA Media Services FA1411001588079 Forum Dec 28 2014 Under the circumstances |
|
2002147 | statefarmcrypto.com | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Dusty Jones | UDRP | 21-Jul-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
2002098 | e-trade.space | E*Trade Financial Holdings, LLC | Sebastien Mene | UDRP | 21-Jul-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or |
|
2001074 | blink-outdoorcamera.comblink-product.clubblink-product.storering-sonnettes.shop [1 MORE] | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Yuan Yan He / Scot G. Komar | UDRP | 21-Jul-2022 |
appears to be presently passively holding the disputed domain names and in the circumstances described above such passive holding constitutes bad faith use of the disputed domain names for the purposes of the policy given the reputation of |
|
2000887 | metaversestatefarm.com | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Anali Cortez | UDRP | 20-Jul-2022 |
has not otherwise been used Passive holding can evidence registration and use in bad faith under the Policy See Indiana University v Ryan G Foo / PPA Media Services FA1411001588079 Forum Dec 28 2014 Under the circumstances Respondent's seemingly |
|
104618 | fabricloropiana.com | Loro Piana S.p.A. | DOMAIN IS FOR SALE AT WWW.DYNADOT.COM ---- c/o Dynadot | | 15-Jul-2022 |
this Panel shares that the passive holding of a domain name with knowledge that the domain name infringes another party s trade mark rights may in itself be regarded as evidence of bad faith registration and use see for example WIPO Case No |
|
2000855 | aglient.com | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Domain Administrator / Fundacion Privacy Services LTD | UDRP | 14-Jul-2022 |
website and Respondent's passive holding of the disputed domain name in these circumstances constitutes warehousing See Morgan Stanley v Koornwinder FA 1913775 Passive holding of a domain name containing a mark with a reputation can be bad |
|
1999065 | openbots.com | OpenBots, Inc. | Luciano Coelho | UDRP | 13-Jul-2022 |
s to an inactive webpage the passive and inactive holding of a disputed domain name can constitute bad faith Respondent has taken active steps to conceal its true identity and used a privacy service prior to disclosure of the underlying registrant |
|
1998949 | lordandtayloer.com | Lord & Taylor IP LLC | cheng ao liu | UDRP | 13-Jul-2022 |
of a given case including passive holding in making its bad faith analysis. See Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows Case No D2000-0003 WIPO Feb 18 2000 after considering all the circumstances of a given case it is possible that |
|
104642 | ikks.vip | IKKS GROUP | Xiang Gang | | 13-Jul-2022 |
According to the Panel a passive holding of the disputed domain name may amount to bad faith when it is difficult to imagine any plausible future active use of the disputed domain name by the Respondent that would be legitimate and not |
|
104641 | arcelormitlal.com | ARCELORMITTAL (SA) | LTD MAPRI EHITUS | | 12-Jul-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding and for this purpose the following factors should be taken into account i the degree of distinctiveness or reputation of the complainant s mark ii the failure of the respondent to submit a response or |
|
1999985 | roberthalfconsultants.com | Robert Half International Inc. | Aris Blackmore / Aris Gates | UDRP | 11-Jul-2022 |
the at-issue domain name passively Browsing to roberthalfconsultants.com returns a system error page The generic page sets out possible explanations as to why no content is reached via the domain name Respondent's passive holding of the |
|
1999636 | jobs-dell.com jobs-dell.xyz | Dell Inc. | mr dell / flashiness | UDRP | 11-Jul-2022 |
the evidence shows that this passive holding of the disputed domain names on the balance of probabilities constitutes bad faith use As this Panel has found that the disputed domain names were registered and are being used in bad faith |
|
1996936 | disney-star.com | Disney Enterprises, Inc. | hide | UDRP | 11-Jul-2022 |
faith… and T he Respondent's passive holding of the domain name … satisfies the requirement of paragraph 4 a iii that the domain name is being used in bad faith by Respondent See also Regions Bank v Darla Atkins FA 1786409 Forum June 20 2018 |
|
104622 | intesasanpaolo.credit | Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A. | Alexander Alberht | | 11-Jul-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding In the WIPO Case No D2006-1440 National Football League v Thomas Trainer the Panel stated when a registrant such as the Respondent here obtains a domain name that is confusingly similar to a famous mark |
|
104605 | lovehoneyworld.com | Lovehoney Group Limited | Ricardo Lin | | 11-Jul-2022 |
Panel notes that the current passive holding does not preclude a finding of bad faith see Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003 In fact the further circumstances surrounding the disputed domain name s |
|
2000433 | schaefer-guess.com | Guess? IP Holder L.P. and Guess?, Inc. | On the Beach Limited / Flights Team | UDRP | 08-Jul-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
1998526 | rockhardtools.com | Rockhard Tools, Inc. | jeff mcclure | UDRP | 08-Jul-2022 |
¶ 4 c ii EMVCo LLC c/o Visa Holdings v Domain Administrator/ China Capital Investment Limited FA 1732580 Forum June 26 2017 finding that the disputed domain names resolved to webpages that recite only the words ‘Coming Soon and therefore holding |
|
104609 | colruytgroep.com | Etablissementen Franz Colruyt N.V. | Johnson ZHANG | | 08-Jul-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding The panel must examine all the circumstances of the case to determine whether the respondent is acting in bad faith Examples of what may be cumulative circumstances found to be indicative of bad faith |
|
104628 | novartisit.com | Novartis AG | Novatris it | | 08-Jul-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding Factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or reputation of the complainant s mark ii the failure of the respondent to |
|
104611 | sexlovehoney.com | Lovehoney Group Limited | Julisof JuliBup | | 08-Jul-2022 |
nor does the Respondent s passive holding of the domain name amount to making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of it The Complainant having made out a prima facie case in relation to the second element the burden of proof shifts to the |
|
104620 | intesasanpaololu.com | Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A. | Block Sicher | | 08-Jul-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or |
|
1998691 | one-csx.com | CSXT Intellectual Properties Corporation | Mary Leon / Hjad | UDRP | 07-Jul-2022 |
1 2022 On June 2 2022 DNC Holdings Inc confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the one-csx.com domain name the Domain Name is registered with DNC Holdings Inc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name. DNC Holdings Inc has |
|
1998469 | morganstandleyclientserv.com | Morgan Stanley | Domain Administrator | UDRP | 07-Jul-2022 |
in considering whether the passive holding of a domain name following a bad faith registration of it satisfies the requirements of paragraph 4 a iii the panel must give close attention to all the circumstances of the respondent's behavior and a |
|
1997500 | lordentaylor.com | Lord & Taylor IP LLC | xiao hong wang | UDRP | 07-Jul-2022 |
which consider so-called passive holding in bad faith which have little relevance. The plain analysis based on the exhibited evidence is that the disputed domain name does or at least did direct Internet users to an online location which |
|
104623 | onlineintesa.net onlineintesa.org | Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A. | Gabriella Campora | | 07-Jul-2022 |
Panels have discussed the passive holding of a domain names e.g in Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003 and found that the passive holding itself can constitute bad faith use The Panel recalls that „the |
|
104633 | novartisplc.com | Novartis AG | ca domains | | 07-Jul-2022 |
page which constitutes passive holding Additionally the Complainant tried to reach the Respondent with the notice of cease-and-desist letter sent on April 20 2022 to the Respondent's email as provided in the WHOIS However until the |
|
1998176 | morganstanleyfutures.net | Morgan Stanley | AnYaWei | UDRP | 05-Jul-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
1998634 | morgan-stanly.co | Morgan Stanley | Stone Gabriel | UDRP | 29-Jun-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
104530 | buyvaldoxan.com | BIOFARMA | Igor Ustimenko | | 28-Jun-2022 |
the Complainant in respect of passive holding but does not need to address them given the clear basis on the basis of other submissions and evidence for finding that that paragraph 4 a iii has been satisfied Procedural Factors The Panel is |
|
104607 | boursorama-fr.click | BOURSORAMA SA | 1337 Services LLC | | 28-Jun-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While UDRP panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of |
|
104599 | hennessy24.biz | Jas Hennessy & Co | Ivan Karalenko | | 28-Jun-2022 |
be met under the doctrine of passive holding giving close attention to all circumstances of the Respondent's behaviour see for example WIPO Case No D2000-0003 The Panel having taken into account the distinctiveness of the well-known Complainant's |
|
104505 | hilfiger-philippines.comhilfigeroutletusa.comhilfigersouthafricas.comhilfigersouthafricass.com hilfigersuomi.com hilfigersverige.com tommygreece.com tommyhilfiger-budapest.com tommyhilfiger-japan.com tommyhilfigeralesuomi.com tommyhilfigerar.com tommyhilfigerarg.com tommyhilfigerauckland.com tommyhilfigeraus.com tommyhilfigerbr.com tommyhilfigerbudapest.com tommyhilfigercanadaonline.com tommyhilfigercaoutlet.com tommyhilfigerchileoutlet.com tommyhilfigercooutlet.com tommyhilfigerdurban.com tommyhilfigerfi.com tommyhilfigergr.com tommyhilfigergreeceshop.com tommyhilfigerirelandsale.com tommyhilfigerkl.com tommyhilfigerkorting.com tommyhilfigermont.com tommyhilfigermyoutlet.com tommyhilfigernzoutlet.com tommyhilfigeronline.com tommyhilfigeronlinesatis.com tommyhilfigeronlinestore.com tommyhilfigeroutletjp.com tommyhilfigerph.com tommyhilfigerphilippines.com tommyhilfigerphoutlet.com tommyhilfigerpolskasklep.com tommyhilfigerpt.com tommyhilfigersalecanada.com tommyhilfigersaleie.com tommyhilfigersaleuk.com tommyhilfigersgoutlet.com tommyhilfigersingaporeoutlet.com tommyhilfigersingaporesgsg.com tommyhilfigersklep.com tommyhilfigersoldes.com tommyhilfigersrbija.com tommyhilfigertorino.com tommyhilfigertracksuitsale.com tommyhilfigertroutlet.com tommyhilfigeruitverkoop.com tommyhilfigerukstores.com tommyhilfigerwebshop.com tommyhilfigerza.com tommyhilfigerzagreb.com tommyirelandsale.com tommyjeansjapan.com tommyoutletcanada.com tommyusasale.com [57 MORE] | Tommy Hilfiger Licensing B.V. | Web Commerce Communications Limited | | 28-Jun-2022 |
s genuine website or passive holding of the disputed domain names cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services The Respondent has not been commonly known by the disputed domain names The Respondent is not making a legitimate |
|
104617 | bouyguesbelgium.buzz | BOUYGUES | zetao jiang | | 28-Jun-2022 |
content which constitutes passive holding Registration and passive holding of a domain name which has no other legitimate use and clearly refers to the Complainant's trademark may constitute registration and use in bad faith RESPONDENT The |
|
104612 | ikksin.xyzikksjob.xyzikksorder.xyzikkstt.xyz ikkswork.xyz ikkszz.xyz [3 MORE] | IKKS GROUP | cheap wasy | | 28-Jun-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding Whether there is passive holding cannot be answered in abstract but rather the Panel must consider the totality of the circumstances applicable to a specific case Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear |
|
1997522 | bitmexmining.com | HDR Global Trading Limited | Bokiri Martins | UDRP | 24-Jun-2022 |
the Panel finds Respondent's passive holding of the domain name satisfies the requirement of paragraph 4 a iii that the bitmex.site domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith by Respondent Complainant argues that the disputed |
|
1996002 | brasfieldsgorrie.us.com | Brasfield & Gorrie, L.L.C. | Mariana Borges | CDRP | 24-Jun-2022 |
to an inactive web site. Passive holding of a domain name is evidence of bad faith. This may not fit within any of the circumstances described in Policy ¶ 4 b but that paragraph recognizes that mischief can assume many different forms and |
|
104548 | buyvaldoxanonline.com coralanpharmacyonline.com | BIOFARMA | Goran Gichevski | | 24-Jun-2022 |
according to the doctrine of passive holding The Complainant concludes that the disputed domain names were registered has been and are being used in bad faith by the Respondent Rights The Complainant has to the satisfaction of the Panel shown the |
|
1997884 | commscopepartner.com | CommScope, Inc. of North Carolina | Marcio Montagnani / MG Music | UDRP | 23-Jun-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
1997572 | rushbet.com | Rush Street Interactive, LP | Chandika Padukka | UDRP | 23-Jun-2022 |
states Respondent only has passive holding of the disputed domain name resolving to a website that lacks substantive content If a respondent uses a domain name to host an inactive or passive website the Panel may find bad faith under Policy ¶ 4 |
|
1996766 | oofos-australia.comoofos-canada.comoofos-espana.comoofos-norge.com oofos-sandals.com oofos-singapore.com oofosaanbieding.com oofosargentina.com oofoscanada.com oofoscanadasales.com oofoschile.com oofoscolombia.com oofosdamark.com oofosfootwearireland.com oofosfootwearnz.com oofosfootwearusa.com oofosfrance.com oofosireland.com oofosmalaysia.com oofosmalaysiashop.com oofosoutletmexico.com oofosoutletnorge.com oofosoutletsingapore.com oofosphilippines.com oofossaleaustralia.com oofossaleireland.com oofossandalerrea.com oofossandalscanada.com oofossandalsnz.com oofossandalssale.com oofossandalssg.com oofosschoenen.com oofosschweiz.com oofossg.com oofosshoesaustralia.com oofosshoescanada.com oofosshoesireland.com oofosshoesnearme.com oofosshoesuk.com oofosshoesusa.com oofosskorsverige.com oofossouthafrica.com oofosuk.com oofosuksale.com oofosusasale.com oofosza.com sandaliasoofosoutlet.com theoofosmall.com [45 MORE] | OOFOS, INC. | Client Care / Web Commerce Communications Limited / Domain Admin / Whoisprotection.cc | UDRP | 23-Jun-2022 |
and so the Panel finds passive holding in bad faith in line with the reasoning in the decision of Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003 which the Panel considers to directly apply to the circumstances of |
|
1993522 | twitter-privacy.com twitter-services.com twitter-supported.com | Twitter, Inc. | Dex Software / Murtaza Dalcı / Ömer Faruk Kaçmaz | UDRP | 23-Jun-2022 |
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness |
|
104535 | tucon.com | Andreas Willmann | Garry Chernoff | | 23-Jun-2022 |
argument of non-use/passive holding Thirdly the Complainant contends that the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith for the following reasons i Speculation in domain names ii Holding domain name for purposes of selling |
|
104580 | bricoferpro.online bricoferpro.website | Bricofer Group S.p.A. | Pedro Tempera | | 23-Jun-2022 |
decisions confirmed that the passive holding of a domain name with knowledge that the domain name infringes another party s trademark rights is evidence of bad faith registration and use see in this regard Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear |
|
104589 | ikks-back.com ikksorder.com ikkstask.com | IKKS GROUP | gdfgd dfdff | | 21-Jun-2022 |
among UDRP panelists that a passive holding of a disputed domain name may in appropriate circumstances be consistent with the finding of bad faith in particular in circumstances in which for example a complainant s trademark is well-known and |
|