Recent Case Activity

Displaying results 901 - 1000 of 8194 matches
20|50|100 results per page
Case Number Domain(s) Complainant Respondent Ruleset Status
D2021-1745
majeparis.net
Maje S.A.S.Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 1247947454 / Hortense Coulon25-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive-holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or
D2021-2110
enel.top
Enel S.p.A.WhoisGuard, Inc. / Jorge Villaronga09-Sep-2021
for a commercial gain The passive holding of the disputed domain name corroborates the Respondent s bad faith The Respondent is the CEO of a marketing company Nahtek Inc providing online SEO services i.e strategies and practices aimed at
D2021-2014
capitecbnk.com
Capitec Bank LimitedWhoisSecure, WhoisSecure / Caleb blessing, every life beat13-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding See section 3.3 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 Moreover the Respondent s use of a privacy service to hide its identity is in this context further evidence of bad faith For the reasons set out above the Panel
D2021-2279
enelenergies.com
Enel S.p.A.Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 1249186223 / Mario14-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding As recorded in section 3.3 of WIPO Overview 3.0 while panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding
103985
arilafoods.com
Arla Foods ambaJOE VICKY21-Sep-2021
this Panel shares that the passive holding of a domain name with knowledge that the domain name infringes another party s trade mark rights may in itself be regarded as evidence of bad faith registration and use see for example WIPO Case No
103987
career-boehringeringelheim.com
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KGJamie Eden21-Sep-2021
domain name is inactive The passive holding of a domain name may amount to bad faith when it is difficult to imagine any plausible future active use of a domain name by the respondent that would be legitimate and would not interfere with the
103956
highsnobietygatezero.com
Titel Media GmbHDOMAIN ADMINISTRATOR21-Sep-2021
name and may be engaged in passive holding of the disputed domain name The Panel notes that the Complainant has supplied examples of publicity regarding the launch of the Highsnobiety Gatezero retail store dated June and July 2021 that is very
DAI2021-0003
arm.ai
Arm LimitedDaniel Hoo, EIo&?Ro-DAIc?A ODIP1 E25-Jul-2021
previous UDRP panels is that passive holding in itself does not preclude a finding of bad faith UDRP panels must examine all the circumstances of the case to determine whether a respondent is acting in bad faith See WIPO Overview 3.0 section 3.3
D2021-2167
rbsconnect.com
NatWest Group plc.Domain Admin, Whois protection / Hulmiho Ukolen, Poste restante09-Sep-2021
domain name The current passive holding of the disputed domain name is further evidence of the Respondent s lack of rights or legitimate interests Furthermore as highlighted in section 2.5.1 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 the Panel finds that the
D2021-2087
first-egg-bank.com
Medicover Holding (Cyprus) LimitedDomains By Proxy, LLC, DomainsByProxy.com / Ruslan Chervak, TD Marketing Global Inc.14-Sep-2021
PANEL DECISION Medicover Holding Cyprus Limited v Ruslan Chervak TD Marketing Global Inc Case No D2021-2087 1 The Parties The Complainant is Medicover Holding Cyprus Limited Cyprus represented by Patpol Legal Piróg i Wspólnicy Sp k Poland
D2021-2206
enelitalos.org
Enel S.p.A.Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 1249043291 / Luog Caleea13-Sep-2021
integra una condotta di c.d passive holding in cui la giurisprudenza internazionale nel caso a domini contenenti marchi anteriori noti individua un chiaro indice di malafede B Resistente Il Resistente non ha presentato alcuna Risposta 6 Motivi
1957836
amlservices-msuk.com
ms-client-au.com
msretailenquiry.com
[1 MORE]
Morgan StanleyFredrick Palmer / Anonymize, Inc.UDRP17-Sep-2021
with 1Api Gmbh Epik Inc Epik Holdings Inc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names. 1Api Gmbh Epik Inc Epik Holdings Inc has verified that Respondent is bound by the 1Api Gmbh Epik Inc Epik Holdings Inc registration agreement
D2021-2296
mps-banking.com
Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena S.p.A..Withheld for Privacy Purposes / Julius Boyler12-Sep-2021
Panel notes that the current passive holding does not preclude a finding of bad faith see Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003 In fact the further circumstances surrounding the disputed domain name s
D2021-2418
finalfourneworleans.com
National Collegiate Athletic AssociationJules Richard IV, Bachi Graphics LLC09-Sep-2021
through Respondent s passive holding of the disputed domain name and the fact that Respondent likely knew of Complainant s rights in the FINAL FOUR mark by registering the disputed domain name which includes Complainant s well known FINAL
1959898
legohogwarts.ru.com
LEGO Juris A/SNabiev RavshanCDRP16-Sep-2021
relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or reputation of the complainant's mark ii the failure of the respondent to submit a response or to provide any evidence of actual or contemplated
1959884
amlservicesms-au.com
retailclientservicesms-uk.com
retailclientsms-au.com
[1 MORE]
Morgan Stanleyfred Baldwin / Balwin Corp / Jamie WIlson / Anonymize, Inc.UDRP16-Sep-2021
in the Previous UDRP Cases Passive holding and fraudulent use are not legitimate or bona fide uses of a domain name The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Names This is registration and use in bad faith with actual
D2021-2142
valentino-shoes.top
Mario Valentino S.p.A.胡可 (Hu Ke)15-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding see section 3.3 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 Moreover UDRP panels have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar particularly domain names
D2021-2207
eneleled.top
Enel S.p.A.Anton Bylah06-Sep-2021
the Domain Name save for its passive holding and no use therefore that could support a finding that it must have had the Complainant and its rights in the mark in mind at that time Although the Domain Name comprises the entirety of the Complainant
D2021-2447
gileadpharm.com
Gilead Sciences, Inc.Ambrose Quin06-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or
1960042
car-enterprise-usa.com
Enterprise Holdings, Inc.Julio Callisaya Escobar / Auto EnterpriseUDRP15-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness
1960334
hobbylobbyhr.com
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.Marie JacobsonUDRP15-Sep-2021
hold the at issue domain name passively Respondent's passive holding of the hobbylobbyhr.com domain name indicates Respondent's bad faith under Policy 4 a iii See Dermtek Pharmaceuticals Ltd v Sang Im / Private Registration FA1310001522801 Forum
1958604
bitmain.jpn.com
Bitmain Technologies LimitedWithheld for Privacy Purposes / Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehfCDRP15-Sep-2021
conclusion that Respondent's passive holding of the bitmain.jpn.com domain name is evidence of bad faith use of it when considered in light of Respondent's efforts to conceal its identity in registering the domain name as well as that it is
D2021-1762
stada.cam
STADA Arzneimittel AGNamecock Cheapli Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / Namecock Cheapli01-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding Factors that panelists take into account whilst looking at all the circumstances include i the degree of distinctiveness or reputation of the complainant s mark ii the failure of the respondent to
D2021-1722
pradabagstmall.com
Prada S.A.Whois Agent, Domain Protection Services, Inc. / Jack Sparrow03-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the ‘passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness
D2021-1964
petplan.top
Pet Plan LtdMohammed Nahhas01-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding see section 3.3 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions Third Edition WIPO Overview 3.0 The Respondent s bad faith is also evidenced by its use of a privacy service to
D2021-2209
shoplegoshop.com
LEGO Juris A/SXu Yan Mei (徐艳梅)06-Sep-2021
currently is not being used passively holding a domain name does not prevent a finding of bad faith registration and use Moreover the Respondent currently holds registrations for several other domain names that incorporate the trademarks of
1958852
dealsxeroshoess.today
outletxeroshoess.today
pusbllmallxeroshoes.shop
[32 MORE]
Feel the World, Inc.winbest/ Tanya Stephens/ See PrivacyGuardian.org/ Domain Administrator/ dasdadaa/ asdasd asdada/ yfgs/ htyse fgdf/ lxuff/ asds ddgfd/ Joel Gilgeous/ ybaa/ Stephen Maynard/ susususu/ Joshua Almazan/ ybb/ Michael WilliamsHill/ Guihong Wu/ Tartan Drive/ sergio deviato/ dfdfdfd fdfdf/ Asdadad/ Asdasdasd Asdasdasd/ aaaabbb/ aavb csdf/ arkjdtk swswsw/ Watson Information Co., Ltd./ Ginifer Stark/ yy/ Moreno Marisol/ gdhfgj/ hgdjdjgh djhgjd/ lxuff/ asds ddgfd/ ybbb/ Jeremy Hickman/ ybb/ Michael WilliamsHillUDRP14-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness
1958520
cioinbase.com
coibase.com
counbase.com
Coinbase, Inc.Aj Singer / Mariela HamannUDRP14-Sep-2021
use of these domain names The passive holding of a disputed domain name typically does not demonstrate abona fideoffering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use per Policy 4 c i or iii See Morgan Stanley v Francis
1957570
ilovekingspoint.com
kingspointgolfandcountryclub.com
kingspointgolfandcountryclub.net
Kings Point Recreation Corporation, Inc.Marty Koitz / martin koitzUDRP14-Sep-2021
name followed by inaction or passive holding constitutes bad faith use of the domain name See Phat Fashions LLC v Kruger FA 96193 Forum Dec 29 2000 finding bad faith under Policy 4 b iv even though the respondent has not used the domain name
D2021-2030
pridestaf.com
PrideStaff, Inc.Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / Mike Gregor02-Sep-2021
for unlawful purposes passive holding of disputed domain name evidence of bad faith For these reasons the Panel finds bad faith registration and use and Complainant has met its burden under paragraph 4 a iii of the Policy 7 Decision For the
D2021-2229
belfiustransaction-fonds.com
Belfius Bank S.A. / Belfius Bank N.V.TOH MOUSSA SORO (T.S.)01-Sep-2021
the Respondent s passive holding of the Domain Name amounts to use of the Domain Name in bad faith B Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant s contentions 6 Discussion and Findings A Identical or Confusingly Similar
D2021-2224
ctc-vietnam.com
CTC Innovations, LLCOn behalf of ctc-vietnam.com owner, Whois Privacy Service / Elizabeth B Allen02-Sep-2021
alleges that Respondent is passively holding the Domain Name and thus Respondent has not used the Domain Name in connection with the bona fide offering of goods or services With respect to the third element of the Policy for the following
1959358
leidoss.org
Leidos, Inc.Ramona MasonUDRP13-Sep-2021
circumstances of inaction passive holding other than those identified in paragraphs 4 b i ii and iii can constitute a domain name being used in bad faith concluding that the question can only be answered in respect of the particular facts of a
1959354
smit-leidos.com
Leidos, Inc.Ramona MasonUDRP13-Sep-2021
similar domain name simply by holding such domain name passively is not indicative of a bona fide offering of goods or services under Policy 4 c i nor of a non-commercial or fair use under Policy 4 c iii See CrossFirst Bankshares Inc v Yu-Hsien
D2021-2196
alitalia.app
Alitalia - Società Aerea Italiana S.p.A.Domains By Proxy, LLC / Doneinco Inglese26-Aug-2021
leads to any active site Such passive holding of a domain name containing a well-known earlier trademark is a clear indication of bad faith In registering the disputed domain name the Respondent had knowledge or at any rate exercised a willful
D2021-2172
edfbond.com
edfbondoffer.com
edfsavings.com
EDF Energy Limited Électricité de France S.A.Withheld for Privacy Purposes, Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / rick snow07-Sep-2021
use under the doctrine of passive holding As first considered in Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003 factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree
D2021-2141
instagramanalyticssoftware.com
instagrambotsoftware.com
instagramemailscraper.net
[18 MORE]
Instagram, LLCWhois Privacy Service Protects this domain, Soluciones Corporativas IP, c/o Whois Proxy / Jose Luis Martinez07-Sep-2021
even in cases of so-called passive holding as found in the landmark UDRP decision Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003 In the circumstances of this case the Panel finds that such passive holding does not
D2021-2376
bureauveiritas.com
Bureau VeritasWolfgang Robert06-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding See section 3.3 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 The Respondent s use of a privacy service to hide its identity is under the circumstances of this case further evidence of bad faith The Panel concludes that the
1959179
radioflyersale.com
Radio Flyer Inc.LW HoraceUDRP10-Sep-2021
The Panel agrees that the passive holding of a domain name does not necessarily circumvent a finding that the domain name is being used in bad faith within the requirements of paragraph 4 a iii of the Policy. See Telstra Corporation Limited v
DNL2020-0034
instagram.nl
Instagram, LLCA. Bourik25-Aug-2021
pointing to the Registrar s holding page since its registration in 2010 Complainant argues that the Domain Name is passively held as it does not resolve to an active webpage and that there is no evidence that Respondent has ever used the Domain
D2021-1387
fendi.africa
FENDI S.r.l.Sainabou Bojang, AAL Domains31-Aug-2021
could reasonably be claimed Passive holding does not preclude a finding of bad faith It is likely that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name to prevent the Complainant from using their trademarks in the disputed domain name An
D2021-1849
hosteliteworld.com
Hostelworld.com LimitedContact Privacy Inc. Customer 1249906602 / Shamlee Pingle26-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding See for example 537397 Ontario Inc operating as Tech Sales Co v EXAIR Corporation WIPO Case No D2009-0567 Thus for the above reasons the Panel concludes that the registration and use of the disputed
D2021-2261
lifeisazoobiscuit.com
National Brands LimitedPrivate Registration , NameBrightPrivacy.com / muiton sae06-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding In this regard the Panel takes into account i the high degree of distinctiveness and reputation of the Complainant s trademark which has been replicated in its entirety in the disputed domain name with
D2021-2247
accorinvest-europe.com
AccorWithheld for Privacy Purposes, Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / warnier francis30-Aug-2021
doctrine of bad faith through passive holding In this respect it indicates in particular that in the absence of any license or permission from Complainant to use such widely-known trademark no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of
103933
cosmoprofebeauty.com
BolognaFiere Cosmoprof S.p.A.Fundacion Comercio Electronico10-Sep-2021
Complainant the Respondent is passively holding the disputed domain name leading to a finding of bad faith In this regard factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or
103946
corporate-intesasanpaolo.com
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.INTESA SAN PAOLO SPA10-Sep-2021
and that the Respondent's passive holding of the disputed domain name is evidence of bad faith RESPONDENT No administratively compliant Response has been filed Rights The Complainant has to the satisfaction of the Panel shown the disputed
103942
grupintesasanpạolo.com
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.james right09-Sep-2021
by the Respondent and the passive holding of the disputed domain name demonstrates the bad faith of the Respondent The Complainant also alleges that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name for phishing purposes Accordingly the
103949
intesasanpalo.xyz
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.thomas tech09-Sep-2021
decisions confirmed that the passive holding of a domain name with the knowledge that the domain name infringes another party s trademark rights is evidence of bad faith registration and use see in this regard Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear
D2021-1800
cabine-harcourt.com
Studio HarcourtXiansheng Li01-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or
D2021-2275
whatsappbusiness.com
WhatsApp, LLCCetin Etem Sezgin03-Sep-2021
element of the Policy See VAT Holding AG v Vat.com WIPO Case No D2000-0607 Accordingly the Panel finds that the Complainant has established element 4 a i of the Policy B Rights or Legitimate Interests The Respondent has not provided any evidence of
D2021-2208
enelmail.com
Enel S.p.A.Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 1249448278 / Daniel02-Sep-2021
website However Respondent s passive holding of the disputed domain name qualifies as use in bad faith in this case Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003 In this regard the Panel notes the reputation of
1954598
barackhobamapresidentialcenter.com
barackhobamapresidentialcenter.org
obamapresidentialcenter.com
[4 MORE]
The Barack Obama Foundationmichael board / Championshipblackjack, IncUDRP07-Sep-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding See Bulgari S.p.A v Zhi Wei Tan D2019-2706 WIPO Jan 6 2020 held that notwithstanding respondent's alleged plans to use the disputed domain for a personal blog sometime in the future respondent's
103879
novartis-adacap.com
Novartis AGMike Sanders08-Sep-2021
this Panel shares that the passive holding of a domain name with knowledge that the domain name infringes another party s trademark rights may in itself be regarded as evidence of bad faith registration and use see for example WIPO Case No
D2021-2271
belfius.ltd
belfiusbank.online
Belfius Bank S.A. / Belfius Bank N.VPrivacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / Raymond Stephen26-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the ‘passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness
DIR2021-0016
alfalaval.ir
Alfa Laval Corporate ABIzak Sedighpour01-Sep-2021
been offered for sale Passive holding of this kind does not asserts the Complainant give rise to any rights or legitimate interests As far as the Complainant is aware the Respondent has never used the ALFA LAVAL trademark to refer to any
D2021-1713
indutrade-se.com
Indutrade ABWhois Privacy/Caleb Love, Caleb Love26-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or
D2021-2148
skyscaner.space
Skyscanner LimitedYurii Chebakov24-Aug-2021
Bad Faith While considering passive holding cases the previous panels did not rule out a finding of bad faith Instead the previous panels relied on a combination of factors relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine including i the degree
D2021-2146
skyscanner.click
Skyscanner LimitedPrivacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / Semen Arnov28-Aug-2021
that the Respondent s passive holding of the disputed domain name constitutes use in bad faith especially because the Respondent has taken steps to mask its identity through the WhoIs privacy services The Complainant notes that previous
D2021-2122
marlboromedicalcannabis.com
Philip Morris USA Inc.Whois Agent, Domain Protection Services, Inc. / 17446501, Cary Friedman02-Sep-2021
this case and the doctrine of passive holding See WIPO Overview 3.0 section 3.3 and section 3.2.1 In fact the current passive holding of the disputed domain names is further evidence of the Respondent s bad faith registration and use Finally it is
D2021-2061
lego-harrypotter.site
lego-harrypotter.website
lego-hogwarts.online
[6 MORE]
LEGO Juris A/SNabiev Ravshan24-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding see WIPO Overview 3.0 section 3.3 While UDRP panels will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine
D2021-2226
michelinmotorbanden.com
Compagnie Générale des Etablissements MichelinMotorbanden Quick Service27-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or
1957728
msamlservices.com
Morgan StanleyAnonymize, Inc.UDRP02-Sep-2021
we conclude that Respondent's passive holding of the domain name constitutes neither a bona fide offering of goods or services by means of the domain name under Policy 4 c i nor a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of it under Policy 4 c iii
DPW2021-0004
mercadopago.pw
Ebazar.com.br, Ltda. Mercado Libre Chile, Ltda. Mercado Libre, Inc. Mercado Libre, S. de R. L. C.V. Mercado Libre, S.R.L. Mercado Libre Venezuela, S.R.L. Tech Fund, S.R.L.Agustin Sego, dev27-Aug-2021
assert that Respondent is passively holding the Disputed Domain Name and therefore not offering any bona fide legitimate or non-commercial goods or services Complainants allege that Respondent registered and is using the Disputed Domain Name in
D2021-1931
musclemonster.info
Monster Energy Company. Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 1249791840 / Farnaughio Nicholson23-Aug-2021
a leading factor in a passive holding analysis In the circumstances of this undisputed record the Panel can conceive of no good-faith reason for Respondent to have registered the Domain Name and that Respondent s passive holding of the
D2021-2000
hmrctaxdepartment.com
The Commissioners for HM Revenue and CustomsWithheld for Privacy Purposes / Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf /maxwell gomez30-Aug-2021
indicative of bad faith i the passive holding of the disputed domain name given the circumstances of the case e.g the fact that the Complainant is very well known in the UK and beyond and that the Marks have been used for many years prior to the
D2021-1986
geaeurope.com
GEA Group AktiengesellschafteXCELLENCES SRL27-Aug-2021
even in cases of so-called passive holding as found in the landmark UDRP decision Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003 In the circumstances of this case the Panel finds that such passive holding amounts to
D2021-1940
enel.space
enelx.space
Enel S.p.A.GEOSIS Srl, GEOSIS SRL30-Aug-2021
well-known earlier marks passive holding can constitute an indication of bad faith Here the Panel finds that the Respondent s passive holding of the disputed domain names constitutes bad faith use and registration see section 3.3 of the WIPO
103943
sicurezza-lntesasanpaolo.com
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.saad ali02-Sep-2021
decisions confirmed that the passive holding of a domain name with knowledge that the domain name infringes another party s trademark rights is evidence of bad faith registration and use see in this regard Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear
DIR2021-0015
steelmittal.ir
Arcelormittal (SA)Saeed Ahmadi23-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or
D2021-1805
middleby-corp.com
The Middleby CorporationRegistration Private Domains by Proxy, LLC / Mariel Konowitz08-Aug-2021
based on Respondent s passive holding and non-use of the disputed domain name i Complainant s MIDDLEBY Mark is highly distinctive recognized as a global leader in its industry and in use for over a century before the disputed domain name
D2021-2104
legonew.com
LEGO Juris A/SDomain Administrator, See PrivacyGuardian.org / Larry Dawley26-Aug-2021
contact the trademark holder passive holding does not as such prevent a finding of bad faith See e.g Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003 Based on that evidence the Panel finds that the Respondent registered
103962
bourso-rama.online
BOURSORAMA SABOURSO01-Sep-2021
name may be considered to be passively held Such passive holding does not allow the Respondent to escape a finding of registration and use in bad faith in circumstances where as here the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the
1956931
clientdepartment-msie.com
ms-clientservice-au.com
msclientdocuments.com
[2 MORE]
Morgan StanleyAnonymize, Inc. / Sammy SmithUDRP31-Aug-2021
domain names are each passively held Respondent's domain names address webpages that fail to show any content Respondent's passive holding of at-issue domain names constitutes neither a bona fide offering of goods or services nor
D2021-1810
facebookliveadulttoys.com
facebookliveappliance.com
facebookliveautoinsurane.com
[102 MORE]
Facebook Inc.Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Rochelle Burrell Unknown Registrant in D2021-181027-Aug-2021
disputed domain names and is passively holding the disputed domain names in a manner that does not demonstrate any rights or legitimate interests Complainant contends that there is no bona fide offering of goods or services associated with the
D2021-2136
eventos-enel.com
Enel S.p.A.Jorge Bravo20-Aug-2021
Finally inactive or passive holding of the Disputed Domain Name by the Respondent may amount to bad faith use See Advance Magazine Publishers Inc and Les Publications Condé Nast S.A v ChinaVogue.com WIPO Case No D2005-0615 Société pour
D2021-2020
michelin-china.com
Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelinyinghui (麻慧燕) / Zhang Hang (张航)25-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding It further states While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of
1958009
7-eleven-pro.com
7-Eleven, Inc.mgame mgameUDRP30-Aug-2021
argues that such non-use and passive holding of the disputed domain name demonstrates that Respondent is not using the disputed domain name for a bona fide offering of goods or services under Policy 4 c i Citing Michelin North America Inc v
D2021-1584
whatsapppay.com
WhatsApp LLCPrivate Registration / NameBrightPrivacy.com / Aykut Doğan26-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding See section 3.3 of WIPO Overview 3.0 Considering that the Panel has found that the Complainant s trademark is well known the Respondent has not provided any evidence of actual or contemplated good-faith
D2021-1698
mercadopago.store
Ebazar.com.br, Ltda. Mercado Libre Chile, Ltda. Mercado Libre, Inc. Mercado Libre, S. de R. L. C.V. Mercado Libre S.R.L. Mercado Libre Venezuela, S.R.L. Tech Fund, S.R.L.Nelio Menezes27-Aug-2021
Domain Name The Respondent s passive holding of the Domain Name does not prevent a finding of bad faith use as the Complainant s trademark MERCADO PAGO is well known the Respondent has concealed its identity and not replied to the Complainant s
D2021-1998
hmrc-tax-refund-secure.com
The Commissioners for HM Revenue and CustomsWithheld for Privacy Purposes / Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / David Stock16-Aug-2021
no longer resolves and is passively held Such passive holding constitutes bad faith in the circumstances of this Complaint the Complainant is very well known both in the UK and beyond and its marks have been used for many years prior to
D2021-2075
onlyfanxs.space
Fenix International LimitedJason Salinas, Jason Shop22-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding See WIPO Overview 3.0 section 3.3 Furthermore Respondent failed to answer the Complaint and failed to respond to a cease-and-desist letter from Complainant From these circumstances the Panel may
D2021-2057
lego-shop.top
LEGO Juris A/SREDACTED FOR PRIVACY, See PrivacyGuardian.org / David Zheng23-Aug-2021
contact the trademark holder passive holding does not as such prevent a finding of bad faith See e.g Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003 Based on that evidence the Panel finds that the Respondent has
1961017
lorax.blog
Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P.Waren Treuhand GmbH / Gerd Umrath et al.URS30-Aug-2021
decisions have held that the passive holding of a domain name could support by clear and convincing evidence that a domain name is being used in bad faith However passive holding does not per se lead in a finding of bad faith use See Central
1957552
ups-worldship.com
United Parcel Service of America, Inc.Frederic ChartierUDRP27-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding. While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness
1957059
sailpoint.dev
SailPoint Technologies, Inc.Kiran GurramUDRP27-Aug-2021
the at-issue domain name passively. Browsing to the domain name returns an error message Respondent's passive holding of sailpoint.dev in this manner is not indicative of a bona fide offering of goods or services under Policy 4 c i nor of a
D2021-1974
bechtelconstruction-jobs.com
bechtelconstructioncompany.net
Bechtel Group, Inc.Withheld for Privacy Purposes, Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / Norman Giles20-Aug-2021
and 5 Respondent s current passive holding of the disputed domain name does not establish rights or legitimate interests Complainant argues that Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain in bad faith because 1 Complainant acquired
D2021-1863
ziprecvruiter.com
ZipRecruiter Inc.Domains By Proxy, LLC, DomainsByProxy.com / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico20-Aug-2021
one considers such use to be passive holding the Panel cannot foresee any use in good faith of the disputed domain name which targets the Complainant and its valuable trademark The connection with the Complainant s trademark is too obvious
D2021-2001
taxrebateform-hmrcuk.com
The Commissioners for HM Revenue and CustomsWithheld for Privacy Purposes, Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / Sam Bentley24-Aug-2021
parking page and is so passively held such passive holding of the Disputed Domain Name constitutes bad faith use Secondly it is submitted that the Respondent s use of a privacy service is indicative of bad faith use considering that the
D2021-1504
aperem.com
Aperam S.A.Rowan Koepp Kirschner21-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or
D2021-1776
qentura.com
Dolopain LLC (an Arizona Company)T. J. Griffin Sr., Griffin IT Media, inc.17-Aug-2021
as true aggregating and holding domain names for resale can be bona fide and is not per se illegitimate under the Policy And because there is no evidence that the Mark is famous Respondent s passive ownership of the Domain Name cannot
D2021-1930
facebookvideoz.com
fbdown.asia
fbdown.biz
[21 MORE]
Facebook, Inc.Haythem Chihi19-Aug-2021
Complainant notes that its passive holding cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods and services under the Policy The Complainant contends that the disputed domain names were registered and are being used in bad faith According to it as
D2021-2032
takepridestaffing.com
PrideStaff, Inc.Whois Agent (080912863), Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc./ Peter Diaz20-Aug-2021
asserts that Respondent is passively holding the disputed domain name and is preventing Complainant from obtaining rightful ownership and control of the disputed domain name Complainant contends that such passive holding by a party that has no
D2021-1628
equlfax.com
Equifax Inc.Jaewan Lee19-Aug-2021
the Respondent s passive holding of the disputed domain name does not prevent a finding of bad faith WIPO Overview 3.0 section 3.3 The third element is present 7 Decision For the foregoing reasons in accordance with paragraphs 4 i of
D2021-1968
mittal-fittings.com
mittal-pipe.com
mittal-steels.com
[1 MORE]
Arcelormittal (SA)余先生 (yu xian sheng), 湖南中跃钢铁有限公司 (hu nan zhong yue gang tie you xian gong si)17-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding See section 3.3 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 For the above reasons the Panel finds that the disputed domain names were registered and are being used in bad faith The Complainant has therefore satisfied the
1956233
morganstanley.??
morganstanley.fit
morganstanley.host
[1 MORE]
Morgan StanleyZhou LiangUDRP24-Aug-2021
mark Respondent is passively holding the domain names and accordingly is not using the domain names for a bona fide offering of goods or services nor for legitimate noncommercial or fair use The morganstanley morganstanley.xin
D2021-1554
casafendi.com
Fendi S.r.l.谢伟霖 (Weilin Xie)04-Aug-2021
faith under the doctrine of passive holding In its determination the Panel considered the degree of distinctiveness and reputation of the Complainant s FENDI and FENDI CASA marks as well as the Respondent s failure to respond in the face of the
D2021-1999
hmrcreclaim-tax.com
The Commissioners for HM Revenue and CustomsWithheld for Privacy Purposes / Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf /Auth Wuwwn16-Aug-2021
page and so is effectively passively held Such passive holding constitutes bad faith in the circumstances of this Complaint the Complainant is very well known both in the UK and beyond and its marks have been used for many years prior to
D2021-1997
hmrc-lockdown-support.com
The Commissioners for HM Revenue and CustomsWithheld for Privacy Purposes / Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / Red Man16-Aug-2021
no longer resolves and is passively held Such passive holding constitutes bad faith in the circumstances of this Complaint the Complainant is very well known both in the UK and beyond and its marks have been used for many years prior to
103927
novartissales.online
Novartis AGGaris Soesilowati24-Aug-2021
website which constitutes passive holding In the WIPO Case No D2000-0003 Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmellows the Panel established that the registration and passive holding of a domain name which has no other legitimate use and
1956671
ukmorganstanley.online
Morgan StanleyPamela ICT Enterprises / Wenzel PamelaUDRP23-Aug-2021
use as Respondent is merely passively holding the disputed domain name iii The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith as Respondent inactively holding the disputed domain name Additionally the disputed domain name is