validated by the Trademark Clearinghouse   b         Providing a sample of use submitted directly with the URS Complaint   a      Existence of a trademark in which the Complainant has rights and is in current use   Complainant proved its rights

registered with the Trademark Clearinghouse Exhibit B which is sufficient to prove actual use of the trademark URS Rule 8.1.2.1 Respondent registered the Disputed Domain on 16 June 2022 The Disputed Domain is used for a website advertising and

validated by the Trademark Clearinghouse   There is no information on the Respondent other than provided by the Complainant as the Respondent has not responded   Legal Findings and Conclusion   Even though the Respondent has defaulted URS

registered with the Trademark Clearinghouse which is sufficient to prove actual use of the trademark under URS Rule 8.1.2.1 Determined Finding for Complainant Disregarding the gTLD club the domain name is identical to the Trademark   URS 1.2.6.2

entry with the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH The registered domain name codesys.site is passively held by the Respondent    Even though the Respondent has defaulted URS Procedure 1.2.6 requires Complainant to make a prima facie case proven by

registered with the Trademark Clearinghouse Registrant would clearly have been aware of Complainant's mark when registering the domain name and did so in bad faith for the purpose of selling the domain name registration to Complainant or to a

validated by the Trademark Clearinghouse   b         Providing a sample of use submitted directly with the URS Complaint   a      Existence of a trademark in which the Complainant has rights and is in current use   Complainant proved its rights

registered in the TradeMark ClearingHouse TMCH on April 16 2014 Additionally the Complainant submits that it owns several domain names including the wording MOBIC such as mobic.info which it registered on July 31 2001 as evidenced by a copy of

validated by the Trademark Clearinghouse   b         Providing a sample of use submitted directly with the URS Complaint   a      Existence of a trademark in which the Complainant has rights and is in current use   Complainant proved its rights

validated by the Trademark Clearinghouse   b         Providing a sample of use submitted directly with the URS Complaint   a      Existence of a trademark in which the Complainant has rights and is in current use   Complainant proved its rights

Data issued by the Trademark Clearinghouse which proves actual use of the trademark URS Rule 8.1.2.1 The Disputed Domain which was registered on 26 November 2020 is used for a website advertising and selling Complainant’s IQOS products as

a declaration by Trademark Clearinghouse   The disputed domain name bnpparibas.earth is identical to the BNP Paribas Trademark with the addition of the suffix ‘.earth The addition of the generic term earth does not eliminate likelihood or

registered with the Trademark Clearinghouse and is protected via registrations in at least 48 jurisdictions as set forth in the attached Annex of Rights Registrant is using the disputed domain name in connection with a website advertising it for

ist die Marke beim Trademark Clearinghouse registriert Die Beschwerdeführerin hat eine Claims Notification wegen der Anmeldung des Domain-Namens erhalten Dies belegt dass die Beschwerdegegnerin darauf hingewiesen wurde dass mit der Registrierung

validated by the Trademark Clearinghouse.No Although you can use your validated trademark record as proof of use in your URS case you can independently provide proof of use with your URS filing No Although you can use your validated trademark

mark with the Trademark Clearinghouse on October 23 2013 This establishes that the mark is in current use   The disputed domain name bnpparibas.fun is identical to Complainant's BNP PARIBAS mark since it contains the mark in its entirety The

validated by the Trademark Clearinghouse   b         Providing a sample of use submitted directly with the URS Complaint   a      Existence of a trademark in which the Complainant has rights and is in current use   Complainant proved its rights

validated by the Trademark Clearinghouse   b         Providing a sample of use submitted directly with the URS Complaint   a      Existence of a trademark in which the Complainant has rights and is in current use   Complainant proved its rights

Registration and Clearinghouse as well as copy of the Respondent's website    Even though the Respondent has defaulted URS Procedure 1.2.6 requires Complainant to make a prima facie case proven by clear and convincing evidence for

also registered in Trademark clearinghouse on November 26th 2013   Complainant asserts as well that the addition of the new gTLD online does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the Complainant's trademark