legitimate� see also Hunter Fan Co v MSS FA 98067 Forum Aug 23 2001 finding bad faith where the respondent used the disputed domain name to sell the complainant's products without permission and mislead Internet users by implying that the

legitimate� see also Hunter Fan Co v MSS FA 98067 Forum Aug 23 2001 finding bad faith where the respondent used the disputed domain name to sell the complainant's products without permission and mislead Internet users by implying that the

Beijen Consulting Pokemon Fan Clubs Org and Pokemon Fans Unite WIPO Case No D2001-1070 In the instant case the Panel finds that the Respondent must have had knowledge of the Complainant s rights in the ARCELORMITTAL trademark at the moment it

record on March 16 2010 as a fan site to link to Complainant's books which is a fair use however this intention was never acted upon � Respondent is willing to transfer the Disputed Domain Name to Complainant He wanted to do this years ago but he

Beijen Consulting Pokemon Fan Clubs Org and Pokemon Fans Unite WIPO Case No D2001-1070 General Electric Company v Marketing Total S.A WIPO Case No D2007-1834 B Substantial commonalities in the web sites to whom the disputed domain names

legitimate� see also Hunter Fan Co v MSS FA 98067 Forum Aug 23 2001 finding bad faith where the respondent used the disputed domain name to sell the complainant's products without permission and mislead Internet users by implying that the

is using the domain name as a fan site and that this gives it a right or legitimate interest in the domain name However is not sufficient simply to allege that a domain name is being used for a fan site without proving that it is one The Panel does

Beijen Consulting Pokemon Fan Clubs Org and Pokemon Fans Unite WIPO Case No D2001-1070 In the instant case the Panel finds that the Respondent must have had knowledge of the Complainant s rights in the BOLLORÉ trademark at the moment it

account and uniform and fan wear � Despite the paucity of evidence provided by Complainant the Panel is prepared to accept that by the time it filed its Complaint on April 29 2022 it had established common law rights in the ISSAQUAH FC mark �

goods see also Hunter Fan Co v MSS FA 98067 Forum Aug 23 2001 finding bad faith where the respondent used the disputed domain name to sell the complainant's products without permission and mislead Internet users by implying that the

analogizes her rights to fan sites She believes that fan sites are allowed because fans published sic favorable information about the topic whether it is a fan site for Pepsi Cola or Pat Benetar She then asks the following pertinent question

and enlivened by photos and fan polls The Respondent submitted information showing that the Complainant filed a Uniform Rapid Suspension URS claim on February 21 2022 seeking temporary suspension of the Domain Name registration The Examiner

Beijen Consulting Pokemon Fan Clubs Org and Pokemon Fans Unite WIPO Case No D2001-1070 BellSouth Intellectual Property Corporation v Serena Axel WIPO Case No D2006-0007 Further the registration of the Domain Name incorporating a misspelled

Clerk France Respondent Name fan Yi Other Legal Proceedings The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name Identification of rights Factual Background FACTS ASSERTED

with a website run by fans of Complainant's services and is used in support of such services � Respondent is a number of OUTLINE lovers who spontaneously and voluntarily spent money and launched a website to further support Complainant's

Inc v 范细女 Xi Nv Fan Case No D2022-0493 1 The Parties The Complainant is Meta Platforms Inc United States of America United States represented by Tucker Ellis LLP United States The Respondent is 范细女 Xi Nv Fan China 2 The Domain

Beijen Consulting Pokemon Fan Clubs Org and Pokemon Fans Unite WIPO Case No D2001-1070 In the instant case the Panel finds it inconceivable that the Respondent was not aware of the Complainant s rights at the moment it registered the disputed

and is therefore not a fan site Under the third element Complainant states that its registration of the CANVA mark predates the registration of the disputed domain name by at least eight years Complainant s marks and business are readily

worldwide news commentary fan sites social media activity endorsements collaborations and partnerships A simple check on any of the most commonly used Internet search engines would have revealed the Complainant s LIVERPOOL FC brand and business

legitimate� see also Hunter Fan Co v MSS FA 98067 Forum Aug 23 2001 finding bad faith where the respondent used the disputed domain name to sell the complainant's products without permission and mislead Internet users by implying that the