names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the Google LLC registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain disputes brought

name's resolving website See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

by a disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

All the results of a Google search of the terms BOURSORAMAMA BANQUE refers to the Complainant Thus the Respondent has registered and used the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark Furthermore the disputed

with the results of a Google Search report for the terms SERVIER and SERVIERC where in both cases the top-ranked results relate to the Complainant Based on those elements the Panel is of the opinion that Respondent knew or should have known

the term daniellington in the Google search engine the returned results point to the Complainant and its business activities In the present case the Respondent failed to file an administratively compliant Response in which it could have provided

evidence that even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA GRUPPO INTESA and GRUPPO INTESA SANPAOLO would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant and that the Complainant owns numerous domain names incorporating its

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 16 2022 On February 16 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

zanussi-serv The results of a Google search of said term are mostly referred to the Complainant s ZANUSSI Mark There is no evidence that the Respondent owns any identical or similar trademarks to the Disputed Domain Name or to the term zanussi-serv

Respondent had carried out Google search for the name BOURSORAMA the search results would have yielded immediate and obvious references to the Complainant It is therefore reasonable to infer that the Respondent either knew or should have known

under Policy ¶ 4 a iii   See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

to Policy ¶ 4 c ii see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

30 2022   On March 30 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the bnyventures.us domain name the Domain Name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that

25 2022   On March 25 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the theceridian-hcm.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

he points to the results of Google Translate a range of images of or taken in or near photo booths uploaded to Getty Images a search of Amazon.fr showing a range of products available for sale in response to a search for photomaton a Google

mark under Policy ¶ 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

by a disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

23 2022   On March 23 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the rrdonnelleysonscompany.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that

address on the signature in Google The Email is purported to have been sent by Complainant It states We are introducing you BARRETT STEEL LIMITED We are the UK s leading commercial renewable energy company We turn blue chip companies and SMEs

and has received over 900 Google reviews.1 As set out below it is clear that the Respondent has sought to target the Complainant through registration of the disputed domain name The Panel finds that the Complainant has established rights in the

use of the domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

links to Facebook Twitter and Google social media sites with similar content and links to third-party advertising for unrelated services such as apartment searches in India At the time of this Decision the Domain Name redirects to a website at

technology companies such as Google Twitter and Telegram 5 While it is theoretically possible that someone could legitimately register a domain name comprising the letters FB as an acronym for words beginning with F and B unrelated to the

sur le moteur de recherches Google avec les termes aximum france renvoyant vers sa filiale Enfin le Requérant soutient que le Défendeur ne démontre aucune activité relative au nom de domaine litigieux et qu il est impossible de concevoir un

21 2022   On March 21 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the bridgewaterfunding.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent

mark into the domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

music business see also Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant's trademark indicates Respondent's bad faith see also CVS Pharmacy Inc

which is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 16 2022 On February 16 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

with Complainant as a cursory Google search would easily reveal the name GORGONZOLA evokes immediately the Complainant s trademark as used for a cheese Italian and European authorities have recognized Complainant s rights on the trademark

the domain name at issue Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

18 2022   On Mar 21 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the twitter-self.com and twitter-secure.com domain names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names Google LLC has

¶¶ 4 c i or iii see also Google Inc v Alex Dori FA 1623672 Forum July 13 2015 Given that Respondent is using the disputed domain name to offer illegal content for download and streaming the Panel finds that Respondent's use of the disputed

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 8 2022 On February 8 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

for NUXE and online in the Google and Baidu leading search engine in China search engines the returned results pointed to the Complainant and its business activities Laboratoire Nuxe has never been contacted by someone willing to register the

similar to MASS SAVE Google Inc v Amcore & Co For Sale Domains 250 or Best Offer FA 267534 Forum June 21 2004 finding googlers.com confusingly similar to GOOGLE The Panel considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to a

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

  Google LLC v Mohammadreza Ahmadi Claim Number FA2204001991748   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Griffin Barnett of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.  Respondent is Mohammadreza Ahmadi Respondent

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Xetcom Portal Claim Number FA2203001989501   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by James R Davis II of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.  Respondent is Xetcom Portal

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Xetcom Portal Claim Number FA2203001988800   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by James R Davis II of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.  Respondent is Xetcom Portal

use under Policy ¶ 4 b iv See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent's use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content constituted bad

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

18 2022   On March 18 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the mcguirewoodsdc.com Domain Name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

trademark agencies.  See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world  

mark under Policy ¶ 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

under Policy ¶ 4 a iii See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum August 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a ‘phishing scheme further established its

¶¶ 4 c i or iii see also Google Inc v Alex Dori FA 1623672 Forum July 13 2015 Given that Respondent is using the disputed domain name to offer illegal content for download and streaming the Panel finds that Respondent's use of the disputed

Annex 7 shows that a simple Google search of the word Michelin produced results that relate only to Complainant.  On this evidence and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary the Panel finds that Respondent is not the owner or beneficiary