the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH The registered domain name codesys.site is passively held by the Respondent    Even though the Respondent has defaulted URS Procedure 1.2.6 requires Complainant to make a prima facie case proven by clear and

the TradeMark ClearingHouse TMCH on April 16 2014 Additionally the Complainant submits that it owns several domain names including the wording MOBIC such as mobic.info which it registered on July 31 2001 as evidenced by a copy of the WhoIs

is also registered in the TMCH since October 23th 2013 The Registrant registered the disputed domain name bnpparibas.icu on January 21 2022 The disputed domain name resolves to a parking page    Even though the Respondent has defaulted URS

including the SMD file from TMCH and printouts from Complainant’s website it is obvious that Complainant � holds a valid national or regional registration and that it is in current use.” Further the disputed domain name �

the Trade Mark Clearing House TMCH since April 16 2014 Please see CAC Case No 101452 Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH v Whois Privacy Corp metacam.xyz By the time the Disputed Domain Name was registered it is unlikely that the Respondent did not

the Trade Mark Clearing House TMCH for which the last renewal was made on April 16 2014 According to Complainant s further non-contested allegations the term METACAM is only known in relation with the Complainant and its METACAM product and has no

is also registered in the TMCH since October 23rd 2013 � URS Procedure 1.2.6 requires Complainant to prove by clear and convincing evidence each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended � A.��

which is registered to the TMCH since November 26th 2013 Complainant adds that given the notoriety of the Complainant and its distinctive trademark the Respondent was aware of the trademark when registering the domain name � URS Procedure 1.2.6

is also registered in the TMCH since October 23rd 2013 The addition of the term FORTIS in reference with the Complainant’s subsidiary Fortis Bank and the new gTLD ICU or � SOLUTIONS” is not sufficient to escape the finding

is also registered in the TMCH since October 23rd 2013 The addition of the term FORTIS in reference with the Complainant’s subsidiary Fortis Bank and the new gTLD ICU or � SOLUTIONS” is not sufficient to escape the finding

is also registered in the TMCH since October 23rd 2013 The addition of the term FORTIS in reference with the Complainant’s subsidiary Fortis Bank and the new gTLD ONLINE is not sufficient to escape the finding that the domain name is

the Trade Mark Clearing House TMCH since 16 April 2014 and ii all the Google results for the term METACAM refer to the Complainant s product Given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademarks and reputation the Complainant finds it

the TradeMark ClearingHouse TMCH on April 16th 2014 The Complainant also owns several domain names including the wording MOBIC such as mobic.info registered since July 31th 2001 The disputed domain name mobic.site was registered on February 7th

mark is registered with the TMCH Respondent received actual notice of OANDA's rights when the domain name was registered As Complainant asserts the evidence indicates that t he clear goal of the disputed domain name is to confuse potential OANDA

is also registered in the TMCH on February 22th 2019 The Domain Name resolves to a French content in which the LE PARISIEN mark is reproduced Moreover the content displays commercial links from Complainant’s competitors The Complainant

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH the Panel recalls that according to the Complaint the Complainant registered the trademark MERCK MILLIPORE with the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH on 16 October 2013 The Complaint then goes on to add that the

registered the Domain with TMCH 23 September 2019 and Respondent registered the Domain Name on 2020�02�10 � Complainant states as well that it has not authorized Respondent to use its trademark LIDL or register the a domain name containing it

is also registered in the TMCH Even though the Respondent has defaulted URS Procedure 1.2.6 requires Complainant to make a prima facie case proven by clear and convincing evidence for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that

is also registered in the TMCH since 2013 Even though the Respondent has defaulted URS Procedure 1.2.6 requires Complainant to make a prima facie case proven by clear and convincing evidence for each of the following three elements to obtain an

is also registered in the TMCH since October 23th 2013 The domain name was created on or about August 30 2020 The addition of the dash â€� ­â€� and the new gTLD CLUB is not sufficient to distinguish the domain name from the Complainant's