Case No Domain(s) Complainant Respondent Ruleset Status
D2017-0289 111xin2.com
222xin2.com
333xin2.com
[71 MORE] 		Lingjia Cai Yongfang Xiang Maolin Zhang - COMPLAINT DENIED
06-Apr-2017

Comments

  • UDRPcommentaries (Gerald M. Levine) 07:09 am 25-Apr-2017
    Lingjia Cai, Yongfang Xiang v. Maolin Zhang, D2017-0289 (WIPO April 6, 2017)
    Complainant alleges 74 domain names fraudulently transferred out of its account. However, it submitted no evidence that any of the domain names are identical or confusingly similar to marks in which it has rights. As the Panel notes “the allegations of theft are outside the limited scope of the Policy and that the present decision does not leave the Complainant without potential redress in the courts.” There is no actionable claim for theft under either the UDRP or the ACPA unless there are marks in which complainant has rights.

Leave a comment

Log in or create an account