Recent Case Activity

Displaying results 3901 - 3920 of 8194 matches
20|50|100 results per page
Case Number Domain(s) Complainant Respondent Ruleset Status
1747660
statefarmwatercleanup.com
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyJohn Myers / Tidal Wave ResponseUDRP12-Oct-2017
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or
DCO2017-0026
jcdeecaux.co
JCDecaux S.A.Jennifer Smith Whois Agent, Domain Protection Services, Inc02-Oct-2017
unlawful purposes The current passive holding of the disputed domain name in the context of typosquatting does not prevent a finding of bad faith registration and use All the points above lead to the conclusion by this Panel that the Respondent was
1746738
peabodyroanoke.com
thepeabodyroanoke.com
Peabody Management, Inc.Shawn BoedeckerUDRP08-Oct-2017
Using the Domain Names for a passive landing page is not a bona fide offering of goods and services or a legitimate non commercial or fair use Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Names Inactive holding of a domain name can constitute
D2017-1122
nordicwatarproofing.com
Trelleborg Waterproofing ABKenneth Pearce26-Sep-2017
of bad faith In fact passive holding of a domain name can also be considered under certain circumstances as bad faith Section 3.3 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003 In the
D2017-1359
motul.parts
MOTULWhois privacy protection service, Internet Invest, Ltd. dba Imena.ua / Alexandr Andrianovich Kazilov27-Sep-2017
with an active website and passive holding is not intrinsically offensive However there are cases where passive holding can amount to bad faith registration and use The panelist in Telstra identified five factors which were relevant on the facts
1747467
morganstanley-global.group
morganstanley-investmentbank.club
morganstanley-investmentbank.group
[5 MORE]
Morgan Stanleyli min / 李敏UDRP06-Oct-2017
to active websites The passive holding of a domain name does not show a legitimate use or bona fide offering of goods or services See Teachers Ins and Annuity Ass n of Am v Wreaks Commc ns Group D2006-0483 WIPO June 15 2006 passive holding
D2017-1414
sanofl.com
SanofiRegistration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Donald Goecke04-Oct-2017
in many UDRP cases that passive holding of a domain name under the appropriate circumstances falls within the concept of the domain name being used in bad faith The Complainant has sent a cease-and-desist letter to the subject registrant
D2017-1308
barça.com
FUTBOL CLUB BARCELONAJavier Garcia de Leániz25-Sep-2017
states that this is a passive holding case citing several UDRP cases that held that passive holding amounted to bad faith registration and use in similar situations The Complainant request as a remedy the transfer of the disputed domain
D2017-1203
similac.vip
Abbott Laboratories吴建华 (WuJianHua)28-Sep-2017
被投诉人被动持有着 passive holding 。 5 事人双方主张 A 投诉人 投诉人主张, 立即将争议域名转移给投诉人,理 如下: 争议域名包含了投诉人在先注册并已经广泛使
D2017-1578
groupon.nyc
Groupon, Inc.Paul Marzolla29-Sep-2017
can be inferred from the mere passive holding of a domain name as is the case here Moreover the Complainant contends bad faith use is further established by the Respondent's attempt to sell the Domain Name for more than its registration cost as
D2017-1524
aqueon.com
aqueon.net
aqueon.org
Central Garden & Pet CompanyNexoGen unknown, NexoGen25-Sep-2017
that the Respondent's passive holding of the disputed domain names constitutes bad faith registration and use within the contemplation of the Policy Additionally the Complainant asserts that the Respondent's submission of false or
101669
arcelorrnittal.com
ArcelorMittal (Société Anonyme)Nicholas Lapez03-Oct-2017
in itself can be bad faith Passive holding of a domain name containing a famous mark is bad faith and the Respondent has not responded to refute the allegation that this is passive holding albeit for a short period of time Accordingly the Panel
D2017-1504
manulifebank.biz
The Manufacturers Life Insurance Companydomain buy, buy domain28-Sep-2017
It is well established that passive use or non-use of a domain name does not prevent a finding of bad faith under the doctrine of passive holding WIPO Overview 3.0 section 3.3 The disputed domain name comprises the whole of the Complainant's mark
D2017-1485
ysl.group
ysl.help
Yves Saint LaurentLI HAI JIE22-Sep-2017
被投诉人被动持有着 passive holding 。 5 事人双方主张 A 投诉人 投诉人主张, 立即将争议域名转移给投诉人。理 如下: YSL为驰名商标。
D2017-1614
sanofi.site
Sanofizhangwenhao27-Sep-2017
disputed domain name and this passive holding was considered in previous UDRP decisions as bad faith registration and use of a domain name The Complainant further contends that it has sent the Respondent a cease-and-desist letter on July 20 2017 to
D2017-1584
directline.group
UK lnsurance LimitedPrivacyDotlink, Customer 28001 118 / Futureproof Domains10-Oct-2017
to an inactive webpage Passive holding of a domain name incorporating a third party well-known mark does not normally amount to a bona fide use It is well established that inaction or passive holding can in certain circumstances constitute
1745812
alienwareindia.com
alienwaremena.com
alienwarethailand.com
[1 MORE]
Dell Inc.Suchada PhrasaengUDRP28-Sep-2017
for the message Index of / passively holding the domain names Inactively holding confusingly similar domain names is evidence of bad faith registration and use under Policy Paragraph4 a iii See VideoLink Inc v Xantech Corporation FA1503001608735
101610
tevasildenafil.com
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.SecureMedical29-Sep-2017
especially in the event of a passive use of a domain name RESPONDENT I The disputed domain name is not identical or confusingly similar to Complainant's registered TEVA trademarks According to the Respondent because of the addition of the term
1747438
sandozcareer.com
Novartis AGSandoz Inc.UDRP27-Sep-2017
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or
D2017-1430
scmichelin.com
Compagnie Générale des Etablissements MichelinRegistrant of domain20-Sep-2017
faith under the doctrine of passive holding While panelists will look at the totality of the circumstances in each case factors that have been considered relevant in applying the passive holding doctrine include i the degree of distinctiveness or