name reflected thereby and by passively holding the disputed domain name the Respondent has made no legitimate commercial or noncommercial use thereof Bad faith in the registration and use of the disputed domain name arises according to the

Panels have also noted that passive holding or non-use of a domain name is evidence of a lack of legitimate rights in the domain name NAF FA-097328 NAF FA-96248 The use of the domain name cannot be considered to constitute a legitimate

Panels have also noted that passive holding or non-use of a domain name is evidence of a lack of legitimate rights in the domain name NAF FA-097328 NAF FA-96248 The use of the domain name cannot be considered to constitute a legitimate

Panels have also noted that passive holding or non-use of a domain name is evidence of a lack of legitimate rights in the domain name NAF FA-097328 NAF FA-96248 NAF FA-1677037 The use of the domain name cannot be considered to constitute a

Arb Forum December 11 2014 holding that registration of the disputed domain name is targeting the Complainant and its trademark as the disputed domain name fully incorporates the Complainant s wellestablished trademark there is no plausible

been established that the passive holding of a domain name may under certain circumstances constitute bad faith use within the meaning of paragraph 4 a of the Policy See WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions Second

behavior the current passive holding of the disputed domain name is in bad faith The Complainant requests that the disputed domain name be transferred to it B Respondent The Respondent did not submit a formal response to the Complainant

long established that the passive holding does not prevent a bad faith finding The Panel cannot conceive of any use of the domain name nearly identical to the trademark of one of the largest banks in Europe that would be legitimate in the

contact the trademark holder passive holding does not as such prevent a finding of bad faith The panel must examine all the circumstances of the case to determine whether the respondent is acting in bad faith Examples of what may be cumulative

�被投诉人消极持有 passive holding � � 被投诉人的名字为 Xing Zeshi ，该名称与 yara 或 雅� 无关� �� 家组无法根据案卷材料认定，被投诉人已因争议域名� �广为人知� � 综上，�

has nonetheless established passive holding in bad faith see paragraph 3.2 of WIPO Overview 2.0 The following are the cumulative circumstances of bad faith the distinctive and high-profile nature of the Complainant trade mark the lack of a

that the Respondent has passively held the disputed domain name and is engaging in no activity Passive holding does not in appropriate circumstances like the current case prevent a finding of bad faith See Telstra Corporation Limited v

This amounts to a case of passive holding of a domain name which previous UDRP Panel decisions have recognised as an instance of bad faith According to the Complainant it is well established that although the principle of first come first serve

contact the trademark holder passive holding does not as such prevent a finding of bad faith See Telstra Corporation Limited v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003 See also Boucheron Holding SAS v zhouhaotian et al NAF Claim Number

the Disputed Domain Names The Passive holding of bets10girisi.net does not give rise to any rights or legitimate interests Accordingly the Panel finds that the Respondents have no rights or legitimate interests in the Disputed Domain Names and the

PANEL DECISION Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance S.A v Wang Zhihua Case No D2016-0753 1 The Parties The Complainant is Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance S.A of Pully Switzerland represented by Valea AB Sweden The Respondent is Wang Zhihua of Shanghai

known about the Complainant Passive holding of a well-known mark as a domain name is evidence of registration and use in bad faith B Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant contentions 6 Discussion and Findings A Identical or

Turning to the current passive holding of fanuc.ro the Panel cannot consider of any use that the Respondents could make of it that would not be considered bad faith in light of the Complainant rights and on this present record Insofar as the

passive holding 域名亦可能� �属于恶意使� �的情形� �先前的第� 注册人除注册本案的争议域名外，� 注册了另� 个域名 remymartin.news � �在�

Complainant contends that the passive holding of the Domain Name does not preclude the finding of a bad faith intent to register and use it particularly where Respondent has taken steps to conceal its true identity identified only as Perfect