a registrar parking site The passive holding of the disputed domain name and the use of the above emails are evidence of bad faith use of the disputed domain name As a result the Panel considers paragraph 4 a iii of the Policy to be fulfilled 7

s several decade old fame and passive holding does not prevent a finding of bad faith use Complainant cannot conceive of any use of the disputed domain name that would not be in bad faith B Respondent Respondent did not reply to Complainant s

Registrar parking page While passive holding of a domain name does not always result in a finding of bad faith the Panel considers that in the circumstances such a finding is appropriate This is based on it being more likely than not that the

administrativos o chamado passive holding também pode caracterizar a má fé quando conjugado com outros fatores Ver 3A Composites USA Inc v Fernando Terzian Caso OMPI No DBR2015-0003 Tendo em vista todo o exposto este Especialista entende que

that the Respondent is holding the Domain Name passively and has provided no evidence of actual or contemplated good faith use The Complainant submits that its trade mark s strong reputation combined with the Respondent s passive use of the

websites With regard to the passive disputed domain names the indicators of bad faith discussed above including the use of a fictitious name and the bad faith use of the active disputed domain names clearly indicate a bad faith passive holding of

�被投诉人被动持有 passive holding � � 5 � 事人双方主张 A 投诉人 投诉人主张，� � 立即将被投诉人注册并正在使� �的争议域名转移给投诉人� �理� �如下：

�被投诉人被动持有 passive holding � � 5 � 事人双方主张 A 投诉人 投诉人主张，� � 立即将被投诉人注册并正在使� �的争议域名转移给投诉人� �理� �如下：

�被投诉人被动持有 passive holding � � 5 � 事人双方主张 A 投诉人 投诉人主张，� � 立即将被投诉人注册并正在使� �的争议域名转移给投诉人� �理� �如下：

�被投诉人被动持有 passive holding � � 5 � 事人双方主张 A 投诉人 投诉人主张� 将争议域名 davidofftea.com 转移给投诉人，理� �如下： A1：争议域名与投诉人享有权利的商�

L The Panel agrees that the passive holding of a domain name does not necessarily circumvent a finding that the domain name is being used in bad faith within the requirements of paragraph 4 a iii of the Policy See Telstra Corporation Limited v

mentioned circumstances this passive holding of the disputed domain name pierrehardyshoes.com is indicative of bad faith use e The Panel also draws inferences of bad faith registration and use from the Respondent s failure to provide any formal

�被投诉人被动持有 passive holding � � 5 � 事人双方主张 A 投诉人 投诉人� �� 家领先知名的全球� �的车辆� 测服务提供商� �投诉人的主要业务包括定期� 测车辆� �� 家鉴定� �车辆安全�

to an active webpage the holding of the disputed domain name together with the other indications of bad faith amount to passive holding in the sense of the expression used in Telstra Corporation v Nuclear Marshmallows WIPO Case No D2000-0003

WIPO Case No D2000-0003 that passive holding of a domain name can be use in bad faith and Octogen Pharmacal Company Inc v Domains By Proxy Inc / Rich Sanders and Octogen e-Solutions WIPO Case No D2009-0786 the Octogen case that where a domain name

to an active website A mere passive holding of a domain name does not constitute legitimate noncommercial or fair use See for example Netcentives Inc v B.W Brody Co WIPO Case No D2000-0672 The Panel accepts the Complainant s contentions In all

reserved used and is holding the disputed domain names willfully in bad faith and in complete disregard of the Complainant s exclusive rights to use and authorize the use of the WIKIPEDIA trademarks The Respondent s actions constitute an

PANEL DECISION Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance S.A v Temme Steve/Steve Inc Case No D2015-1089 1 The Parties The Complainant is Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance S.A of Pully Switzerland represented by Valea AB Sweden The Respondent is Temme

and convincing evidence The passive holding of a domain name for a long period of time of itself does not confer rights or legitimate interest to the registrant Therefore the Panel finds that Respondent has failed to actively use the domain name

and its rights and even the passive holding of such well-known names amounts to bad faith B Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant s contentions 6 Discussion and Findings Preliminary Matters So far as the Policy is concerned