examples of the same for eg APPLE After Eight Charlie Hush Puppy Caterpillar Grey Goose Jaguar Red Bull Dove Puma Grass Hopper Camel to name a few These words then get associated with a particular manufacturer or trader While the original meaning

UDRP decisions see e.g Apple Inc v Ukolen Poste restante / Domain Admin Whois Protection Hulmiho WIPO Case No D2015-0461 AB Electrolux v Ilgaz Fatih Micik WIPO Case No D2009-0777 Aktiebolaget Electrolux v ibp WIPO Case No D2013-0795 AB

trademarks ACM and ACM AWARDS Apple Computer Inc v Tim Lackey Case No DME2014-0001 WIPO Apr 6 2014 The APPLE Marks were well-known and famous at the time Respondent registered the Domain Name incorporating the APPLE trademark The Domain Name

and Sound Unseen Ltd Apple Bottoms LLC and Cornell Haynes p/k/a Nelly v Patrick Vanderhorst WIPO Case No D2005-0636 Consequently all arguments put forth by the Respondent questioning the validity of any of the Complainant TRAVELPRO Marks

are offered on the iTunes Apple Store side by side and comments that the notation of HomeWhiz with a capital W on the second word element is identical The Complainant asserts that this indicates an awareness of the Complainant and its app at

of the words such as apple or kfc in a domain name mean that these domain names are owned by APPLE Inc or KFC Inc The Respondent further argues that the Complainant did not register the trademarks which appear in the disputed domain name

a second bite at the apple would not be in line with the spirit of expediency and efficiency suggested in the Policy Blandy & Blandy LLP v Mr Daniel Beach WIPO Case No D2012-0972 The Panel also considered making a finding of Reverse Domain

CARESYNC mark and its related apple logo and displayed active links to Complainant s Apple and Android mobile apps The content had the appearance of promoting Complainant s products and gave the appearance of an official connection to Complainant

4 b iv of the Policy see Apple Inc v Domain Privacy Ltd WIPO Case No D2012-0620 The third requirement of the Policy has been fulfilled 7 Decision For the foregoing reasons in accordance with paragraphs 4 i of the Policy and 15 of the Rules the

the respondent in the case of Apple Computer Inc v DomainHouse.com Inc WIPO Case No D2000-0341 in which it described itself as a trader in domain names The panel in that case found that the respondent used the domain name domainhouse.com and

many websites that sell Apple products We have just started selling and advertising Dmag Germany And that just for the benefit of the company is Demag All costs of advertising and marketing we have been in favor of the company Demag And we're

proposition is that the word apple is generic so far as the fruit that it describes is concerned but is not so in the field of computers or for that matter music as many fans of The Beatles will attest Fakir is an unusual word but not so unusual

well-known brands including Apple Galaxy and Playstation The Complainant requests a transfer of the disputed domain names B Respondent The Respondents did not reply to the Complainant s contentions 7 Discussion and Findings In order to succeed in

the popular apps available on Apple iTunes AppStore The Complainant is the owner of the following registered trademark for the term SNAPCHAT     together the Trademark The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on October 20 2015 The

Sanpaolo S.p.A v Rika Doi Apple / Whois Privacy Protection Service by onamae.com WIPO Case No D2014-1862 7 See Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A v Huang You Bao / Huang You Bao WIPO Case No D2015-0623 8 See Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A v Angelo Tristano WIPO Case

the respondent s rights e.g Apple Inc v Private Whois Service WIPO Case No D2011-0929 Department of Management Services State of Florida v Digi Real Estate Foundation WIPO Case No D2007-0547 Policy precedent on consolidation generally summarized

revenue-generating app on Apple App Store during July 2013 In December 2015 it was the top revenue generator on the App Store bringing in some USD 59.7 million in that month alone The Complainant owns various registered trade marks for the term

the brands HBO Warner Bros Apple and 20th Century Fox The emails summarised in this and the preceding paragraph were annexed to a First Supplemental filing by Complainant dated February 19 2016 4.C.5 In a second Supplemental filing dated

for example BBC CVS apple polo and MTV Panels have recognized that mere registration of a domain name even one that is comprised of a confirmed dictionary word or phrase which may be generic with respect to certain goods or services may

with such trademark see Apple Inc v Protection WIPO Case No D2014-0187 Volvo Trademark Holding AB v Michele Dinoia WIPO Case No D2004-0911 and Apple Inc v Contact Privacy Inc / Grand Slam Co WIPO Case No D2012-0844 In relation to the