D Casey Presiding Panelist David H Bernstein Panelist M Scott Donahey Panelist Dated February 26 2002 D2001 1201 federally registered world famous D2000 0937 P L A Y B O good name well established 0841 non commercial pay for placement on line re

Haviland Mark Partridge and David Perkins were formally appointed Panelists The Projected Decision Date was October 8 2001 which was subsequently extended to October 15 2001 and then October 31 2001 The Panelists find that the Administrative

as Panelists and that David H Bernstein had been appointed as Presiding Panelist On September 19 2001 and September 21 2001 Complainant filed two new complaints which were assigned Case Nos D2001-1134 against the Respondent George Samuel

Esq Presiding Panelist David Bernstein Esq Panelist Paul Mason Esq Panelist Dated November 26 2001 D2001 1005 well known follow up D2000 0017 0071 Wal Mart 0150 non commercial 0275 0236 1693 0110 out of pocket 0115 0118 HiLetsWorkTogether

of the members of this Panel David Bernstein in his decision on the same topic in Magnum Piering Inc v The Mudjackers & anor WIPO Case D2000-1525 For all the above reasons the Panel concludes that in this case there is no reason why it should not

the Center appointed David H Bernstein as the sole panelist in this matter On October 2 2001 after reviewing Respondent Response the Panel noticed that several exhibits to which the Response referred were not attached The Panel directed

Communications Group Inc v David Lahoti dba eSecure Claim Number FA0109000100124 PARTIES Complainant is Commonwealth Communications Group Inc Newton MA Complainant represented by Cory B Schauer of Gargill Sassoon & Rudolph LLP Respondent is

proceeding Hon Ralph Yachnin David Bernstein Esq and Hon James A Carmody Chairman as Panelists PROCEDURAL HISTORY Complainant submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum the Forum electronically on July 24 2001 the Forum received a

the Center appointed David H Bernstein as the Sole Panelist and informed the parties that the expected date of decision was August 10 2001 On August 2 2001 Respondent sent an email directly to the Panel attaching the text of a November 9

of the appointment of Gordon David Harris and Dennis Arthur Foster as panelists and David H Bernstein as presiding panelist The Center also advised the parties that the due date for this decision is August 20 2001 4 Jurisdictional Issues Before

Froomkin as Panelists and David H Bernstein as the Presiding Panelist in this matter 1 Pursuant to Rule 10 c and to i provide the parties an opportunity to submit their preferences for the Presiding Panelist and ii allow the Panel sufficient

transfer of the Domain Name David H Bernstein Presiding Panelist Frederick M Abbott Panelist Michael Froomkin Panelist Dated August 2 2001 Footnotes 1 Complainant usually does not capitalize the name of its movement apparently for doctrinal

parties that it had appointed David H Bernstein as the sole panelist in this manner and set July 24 2001 as the expected date for decision The parties have not filed any additional submissions 4 Factual Background Because Respondent has not

W Page the Presiding Panelist David H Bernstein and Paul M DeCicco collectively the Panel The Panel has considered the Complainant s request to file a Reply and unanimously decided not to consider the Reply Supplemental filings are inappropriate

14 2001 the Center appointed David H Bernstein as substitute Panelist Respondent moved to have Mr Bernstein disqualified as well arguing that he too is biased against Respondent In the alternative Respondent requested that Mr Bernstein recuse

notified the Parties that David H Bernstein had been appointed as the sole panelist in this matter 4 Factual Background Complainant a Fortune 500 company is a manufacturer and provider of computer related goods and services and has sales

8 2001 the Center appointed David Bernstein as the Panelist and notified the parties that the projected decision date is June 22 2001 4 Factual Background The following facts are uncontested Complainant is a for-profit business entity that offers

Partridge as panelists and David H Bernstein as presiding panelist 4 Factual Background Because Respondent has submitted no Response we accept the allegations of the Amended Complaint as true See Rita Rudner v Internetco Corp Case No D2000-0581

the Center appointed David H Bernstein as the Sole Panelist in this matter On May 15 2001 the Panel issued an Interim Order the relevant portions of which are reprinted below Both the Policy and the Rules demonstrate a strong preference

Robert A Fashler and David E Sorkin as Panelists and David H Bernstein as the Presiding Panelist in this matter 4 Factual Background The Panel has reviewed the Complaint and Response The following facts appear to be undisputed Complainant