the use of social media on Facebook Twitter and Google pages According to Similarweb.com the Complainant �s websites at its primary domain names jll.com and joneslanglasalle.com have received 740530 and 98980 visitors in the past 6 months

of the Complainant �s Facebook page dated May 25 2018 with 129562 likes and evidence of a relatively small amount of USD revenue derived from the Complainant �s use of the Trade Mark The Respondent concedes that the Complainant has arguably

sitios de redes sociales como Facebook Twitter YouTube y otros y ha desarrollado un número considerable de seguidores en cada sitio Como resultado de la extensa utilización y promoción de MARRIOTT por la Demandante esta marca se ha vuelto famosa

the use of social media on Facebook Twitter and Google pages According to Similarweb.com the Complainant �s websites at its primary domain names jll.com and joneslanglasalle.com have received 740530 and 98980 visitors in the past 6 months

for example American Express Facebook Federal Express Land Rover PayPal and SalesForce or coined terms from clippings of words for example Microsoft and Netflix Moreover Respondent s argument that it is well-known within the public and CrossFit

media platforms such as Facebook Youtube Instagram Google and Twitter The disputed domain name klarna.group was registered on August 12 2017 It is being offered for sale and currently does not resolve to any active website 5 Parties �

media platforms such as Facebook Youtube Instagram Google and Twitter The disputed domain name starstable-kody.online was created on September 17 2017 and currently resolves to a page lacking content 5 Parties � Contentions A Complainant i

can constitute bad faith Facebook Inc v Werner Gonzalez WIPO Case No D2017-2046 holding that using �a domain name for phishing related activities is inherently in bad faith � Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance S.A v Harry Bradley Harry B Holdings

trademark in its entirety e.g Facebook Inc v Mirza Azim WIPO Case No D2016-0950 Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v Christian Viola WIPO Case No D2012-2102 Volkswagen AG v Nowack Auto und Sport Oliver Nowack WIPO Case No D2015-0070

has established rights in the FACEBOOK and INSTAGRAM Marks based on longstanding use as well as its numerous trademark registrations for the FACEBOOK and INSTAGRAM Marks in the United States and other jurisdictions The Disputed Domain Name

social media websites i.e Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Google and Pinterest The Complainant has proven to be the owner of the FENDI and Fan di FENDI trademarks which enjoy protection through numerous registrations worldwide The

social media e.g through its Facebook account at www.facebook.com/Esselunga/ The Complainant is the registered proprietor of the following trade mark registrations Jurisdiction Trade Mark Registration No Registration Date Class Italy ESSELUNGA

the positive comments on the Facebook page annexed as a screenshot of positive feedbacks of random users of the Complainant are primarily the Complainant own replies assuring correspondents of its legitimacy and the genuineness of its tickets The

the parties there was no Facebook or LinkedIn page for any individual by that name in the United States At some later date a Facebook page was created for Jessica Raldi but that page contains no content Complainant states that it has been

as facebook.com.ar Argentina facebook.be Belgium facebook.com.br Brazil facebook.cn China facebook.co Colombia facebook.eu European Union facebook.fr France facebook.de Germany facebook.com.gr Greece facebook.hu Hungary facebook.in India

the disputed domain name and Facebook page depicts as relevant image the same purple layout which characterizes the Complainant own color scheme and the message which in English roughly translates to Paying all your payment slips with Bitcoin or

found also on a corresponding Facebook-Page The Complainant addressed Facebook asking the deletion of pinoycinemaxx-Facebook-page due to trademark infringement and Facebook already shot this Facebook-Page down The Complainant further contends that

and iii screenshots of a Facebook page Firstly it should be noted that a right to a trade name under Dutch law is only established through actual use and not through the sole recordal in the Dutch company register Secondly despite Respondent

social media presence on Facebook LinkedIn and Twitter including pages for JLL Argentina The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on February 2 2018 according to the WhoIs records The WhoIs record submitted by the Complainant