its website direct marketing Facebook Internet search engine optimization services lead generation services Complainant advertises its services through its website direct marketing Facebook Internet search engine optimization services lead

en el año 2009 su página de Facebook https //www.facebook.com/yoreparooficial/ Actualmente esta página de Facebook cuenta con más de 16000 seguidores p Tan solo en el año 2013 el sitio web www.yoreparo.com generó en ingresos por Adsense USD

Us Visit Us Facebook Twitter YouTube Flickr Scribd RSS Newsletters Search search HomeIP Services Alternative Dispute Resolution Domain Name Disputes Search adrSearch WIPO Cases and WIPO Panel Decisions View Case Particulars

For example Harley s Facebook page which has more than 7218000 followers provides an online community for Harley s customers to share photos and comments regarding their own HARLEY motorcycles and experiences and thousands upon thousands

Additionally Respondent s Facebook page contains numerous references to its online rental program at austinstringsrental.com Respondent asserts that none of Complainant s bad faith arguments are persuasive Complainant has not submitted evidence

trademark HAVELLS In fact in Facebook Inc v Naija Host WIPO Case No D2015-1057 the Panel held that the inclusion of the country name serves only to reinforce confusing similarity rather than distinguish the disputed domain name Similarly in

Comments on the Respondent Facebook page show that the Respondent refuses to respond to copyright complaints allows users to post illegal material and is being sued for violations of federal law The Respondent has not been commonly known by the

than 63000 consumers like its Facebook page and more than 7000 consumers follow its Twitter account Complainant holds a U.S trademark registration for T&N as a standard character mark The application was published for opposition on August 4 2015

official LinkedIn profile Facebook Twitter and job advertisements The Respondent has engaged in pattern of abusive registration and registered multiple domain names which are similar to trademarks So far the Respondent has registered domain

available online such as Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn and Google In addition to its strong international reputation Complainant has secured ownership of numerous trademark rights in the terms MOZILLA FIREFOX and THUNDERBIRD in many

and social media including Facebook Twitter and LinkedIn The Complainant provides examples of its marketing materials The Complainant states that its primary marketing platform is located at www.sandown-group.co.uk which has been active since

seventh most shared site on Facebook with over 2 million shares The Complainant site has hundreds of thousands of followers on Facebook Instagram Twitter and its YouTube account The Complainant is the owner of a United States trademark

of Respondent No 1 xviii The Facebook icon on Respondent No 1 website www.jeevansathi.expert when clicked redirects to a Facebook page that is named jeevansaathy.com and the contact details show details of the Respondent No 2 in addition to the

presence on sites including Facebook Twitter and LinkedIn It states that it has owned the domain name evoswitch.com since December 2005 although that domain name is in fact registered to Ocom IP B.V The Complainant submits that the disputed

website the DeBeers Facebook and Instagram pages and the Wikipedia entry for De Beers Telephone number and physical co-ordinates for an outlet in New York in the United States of America are set out This section is headed by a graphic of

reviews from both Google and Facebook and that Complainant recently conducted a question and answer session with MoneyCrasher.com a website devoted to personal finance Complainant alleges that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the

previously created pages on Facebook such as Zalatimoh Arabic Sweets L.L.C Zalatimoh.dubai in 2014 The Complainant annexes documents evidencing these activities which include a message sent from a family member of the Respondent to the Manager of

posted on the Complainant s Facebook page on August 30 2015 An article dated August 27 2015 indicates that UnMail was earlier known as Octopus On January 6 2016 the Complainant announced that it had received its 13th consecutive award for Unmail

litigieux et d un site Facebook Dans la première page sur le site web le visiteur retrouve sur la droite l accès à la page Facebook associée à la partie Annexe 6 de la Réponse reportage journalistique et le lecteur ou visiteur voit le

Yang WIPO Case No D2015-1129 Facebook Inc v on behalf of customers WIPO Case No D2016-0244 Furthermore confusion is created since the Complainant deals mainly with insurance In view of the above the Panel finds that the Complainant has discharged