networks including YouTube Facebook Twitter Instagram and Google The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights In particular the

incorporating the FACEBOOK trade mark including facebook.com facebook.org facebook.net facebook.biz and facebook.cn The disputed domain names facebooksz.com and facebookwatches.com were registered on March 26 2013 and May 20 2011

que incluyen el término FACEBOOK por ejemplo facebook.com facebook.org facebook.net y facebook.biz así como bajo extensiones de países tales como facebook.com.ar Argentina facebook.be Bélgica facebook.com.br Brasil facebook.cl Chile

que incluyen el término FACEBOOK por ejemplo facebook.com facebook.org facebook.net y facebook.biz así como bajo extensiones de países tales como facebook.com.ar Argentina facebook.be Bélgica facebook.com.br Brasil facebook.cl Chile

WIPO Case No D2015-1129 and Facebook Inc v on behalf of customers WIPO Case No D2016-0244 In view of the above the Panel finds that the Complainant has discharged its burden of proof on this point and holds that the disputed domain name

social media including Facebook Complainant maintains a list of authorized servicers for its customers who need repairs done on their Thermador appliances The Domain Names were registered on February 20 2013 thermadorrepair.biz and December

and carries a link to a Facebook page where the operator of the Website claims that it is the official representative or distributor of the Complainant The content of the Website was previously available on the website at www.crest.bg On

media platforms such as Facebook YouTube and Twitter The disputed domain name was registered on August 26 2015 At the time of the filing of the Complaint it did not resolve to any active website A cease and desist letter was sent to the

xyz is of no consequence here Facebook Inc v Radoslav Claim Number FA1308001515825 The Examiner finds that the Complainant met the standard set out in 1.2.6.1 of URS Procedure the Complainant proved that it holds a valid trademark German trademark

is of no consequence here Facebook Inc v Radoslav Claim Number FA1308001515825 The Examiner finds that the Complainant met the standard set out in 1.2.6.1 of URS Procedure the Complainant proved that it holds a valid trademark Britsh trademark

uptodatecontent.net/Free iPad Facebook.com are unrelated to the Complainants FOODSAVER products Screenshots of the landing page to which the disputed domain name resolves a representative selection of the pages to which the links on the landing

views in 2008 as well as on Facebook at www.facebook.com/MonsterArmy with more than 770000 fans Complainant argues that the disputed domain name monster.army is identical to its MONSTER ARMY mark and the disputed domain name monstergirl.club is

uma página na rede social Facebook nomeada Samsung Outlet indicando link para o nome de domínio em disputa fazendo-se passar como uma página oficial da Reclamante Defende a Reclamante que o Reclamado teria nitidamente registrado e utilizado o

on social media sites such as Facebook www.facebook.com/TheSimpleDollar Twitter www.twitter.com/TheSimpleDollar Linked In www.linkedin.com/company/the-simple-dollar and other social media sites The Domain Name was registered by Respondent on

is located Complainant Facebook page is NVRT for clothing and Complainant business NVRT offers clothing for sale at the NVRT Facebook page incorporating Complainant trademark for NVRT b Specify in the space below why the Respondent

TOP is of no consequence here Facebook Inc v Radoslav Claim Number FA1308001515825 In any event the new gTLD MELBOURNE is generic as compared to the distinctive expressions VIRGIN and VIRGIN AUSTRALIA and therefore does not eliminate the likelihood

registrations in the term FACEBOOK all over the world including in China where the Respondent seems to be based In particular the Complainant owns United States Trademark No 3041791 FACEBOOK registered on January 10 2006 United States Trademark

demonstrated in Respondent s Facebook messages regarding Complainant See Compl at Attached Ex 7 and 8 The Panel finds such use by a respondent to evince neither a bona fide offering of goods or services nor a legitimate noncommercial or fair use

also in social media such as Facebook Twitter YouTube and Instagram Its activities have received substantial press coverage in prestigious fashion publications such as Elle Esquire and Vogue The Complainant owns many trademark rights in the term

or confusing similarity Facebook Inc v Radoslav Claim Number FA1308001515825 In this case Examiner finds that the new gTLD INTERNATIONAL increases the potential confusion amongst Internet users given the international nature of the services