arbitration forum DECISION Facebook Inc v Daniel Kastner / Kastner No Squares Claim Number FA1206001450503 PARTIES Complainant is Facebook Inc Complainant represented by Aaron M Fennimore of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is Daniel Kastner

domain name Respondent has a Facebook page where it is promoting the microsoft �iran.com website and provides a link to the disputed domain name Respondent registered and was using the microsoft-iran.com domain name in order to create an

the public including through Facebook and Twitter and by posting videos about products and services on Complainant s YouTube channel and in advertisements in print media Complainant provides evidence of its uses of the mark on brochures business

out via e-mail phone or facebook If you'd rather not share her contact info I can be reached at XXXXX@gmail.com via cellphone at XXX-XXX-XXXX and via facebook My wife can be reached at XXXXX@gmail.com or at XXX-XXX-XXXX I would appreciate it

talk to fans like he does on facebook The Panel finds that this communication does not constitute Other Correspondence for the Arbitrator to consider and that it does not constitute a formal offer to transfer Therefore the Arbitrator finds that it

including for instance on the Facebook social media site at www.facebook.comNEVO where Plaintiff has over 2.1 million friends and on Twitter under the @VEVO handle where it has over 250000 followers Complainant services under the VEVO mark have

RESCUE appears on Complainant facebook page articles of incorporation registration with the State of California Attorney General office website Internet blogs printed materials such as handouts brochures banners and signs and contact information

operates a social media site facebook.com/dvdcatalyst the e-mail address dvdcatalyst@gmail.com and message boards at DroidForums.com Xoomforums.com and Barnes and Noble s NOOK support forum Complainant argues that this evidence sufficiently

Complainant has an ongoing Facebook dispute with Respondent and because Respondent uses designer names and pictures on its web site and sells counterfeit products B Respondent Respondent says · The Disputed Domain Name is not confusingly

Complainant states that the Facebook page for Shawn Llloyd lists both the billboardradioonline.com and thehot100radio.com domain names and that the content found at the websites corresponding to those domain names is similar Complainant also

Complainant s website at facebook.com is among the top 2 most-trafficked websites of any kind in the world according to web information company Alexa The FACEBOOK site which operates under and features the FACEBOOK trade name and trademark as

the ability to share in facebook Additional information about domain names in Cyrillic http //help.superhosting.bg/ A sale of the domain and it suggest to you first To date the site has not been published anywhere As soon yet making seo

links to a page on the Facebook websitewherein Respondent states that its mission is to create a mighty news company in service to American democracy not the corporate owned propaganda machine beholden to the oligarchs Copies of the relevant

s website by liking it on Facebook and posting favorable reviews on their walls Respondent then invites visitors to click download below for the PC beta version of this game Visitors clicking the button are informed that the download file will

the Santa Barbara area 4 the Facebook page does not support public recognition because anyone can create a Facebook page 5 the video was a self-promotional piece done by Complainant and 6 the AdSense information only shows the popularity of the

argues that it uses Twitter Facebook and YouTube to promote its CJ.COM website and that Complainant has been featured in articles discussing its services See Complainant s Annexes G-J Complainant asserts that it was named a Rising Star in the

faithful followers on its Facebook and Twitter accounts and apps available for iPhone and Droid users Complainant has spent considerable resources since it started the Rue La La Internet website in 2008 in promoting its website As a result of

and also on facebook running adverts over these years · The Respondent questions and contends as to why Complainant is interested only in the disputed domain name gogoleghana.com and not in net / org which is also registered ·

assertions 1 Respondent s facebooklive.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s FACEBOOK mark 2 Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the facebooklive.com domain name 3 Respondent registered and used the

� �� ，争议域名 facebookskype.com 将facebook�'�skype组合在� 起� �形成的可识别部分facebookskype不仅没有起到与投诉人SKYPE商标相区别的作� �，反� �使人容� 认为争议域名与投诉人相关� �