is a commonly used name in Facebook pages and that various domain names are available for registration incorporating this name She further notes a prior case concerning a domain name identical to the Disputed Domain Name in which the complaint

por ejemplo la decisión en Facebook Inc c Usta Cafer Caso OMPI No DES2009-0006 o bien la decisión en Citigroup Inc Citibank N.A v Ravi Gurnani Gurnani Caso OMPI No DES2006-0001 En el presente procedimiento este Experto considera que la

Caso OMPI No D2001-1183 Facebook Inc v Usta Cafer Caso OMPI No DES2009-0006 Caso Autocontrol Cederroth Ibérica S.A.U v Jesús Vidriales Francho y Edintorni Europe SRL v New Business Synergies S.L Caso OMPI No DES2010-0009 En este caso el

social networking website Facebook Complainant has over four million active users throughout the United States Respondent Josh Hughes registered the cartown-cheats.com freecartownpoints.com and freecartownpoints.info domain names no earlier

also registering Twitter and Facebook accounts using Complainant s trademarks Finally the Complainant states that the Respondent s accusation of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking is frivolous and should be rejected Respondent s Additional Submission

IRES Inc Twitter and Facebook Complainant has spoken at the Fordyce Forum Hireability.com conference Top Echelon/Big Biller conference and many others Complainant has received a gubernatorial appointment in New Jersey and has spent over

and insignificant number Facebook.com which was created in 2004 today enjoys 500 million users Twitter.com which like ClubPenguin.Com came online in 2006 enjoys membership of 105 million and of 180 million unique visitors In contrast

information a visitor to the Facebook page was invited to contact an email address which was the same as that provided for the registrant in the Whois particulars for the Domain Name The Complainant also produced a web page from the website at

internet on sites like hyves facebook orkut as profiles communities and others long before any notice of the dispute was sent See for an example http //www.orkut.com.br/Main Community cmm 9459112 Broms Hard Rock Caf is also commonly known by the

information a visitor to the Facebook page was invited to contact an email address which was the same as that provided for the registrant in the Whois particulars for the vanishamittal.com domain name The Complainants also produced a web page from

cases have noted that the FACEBOOK mark consists of a coined expression which is inherently distinctive see Facebook Inc v Privacy Ltd Disclosed Agent for YOLAPT WIPO Case No D2007-1193 Facebook Inc v Talkbeans Media Limited WIPO Case No

with related services citing Facebook Inc v Privacy Limited Disclosed Agent for YOLAPT WIPO Case No D2007-1193 iii The services which have been provided by the Respondent through the Respondent s website are identical to some of the services set

has some 227000 friends on Facebook and 32000 followers on Twitter The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant s protected identifier ASOS It is also confusingly similar to the Complainant s protected identifiers AS SEEN ON SCREEN

with related services citing Facebook Inc v Privacy Ltd Disclosed Agent for YOLAPT WIPO Case No D2007-1193 iii The services provided by the Respondent through the Respondent s website can be seen by some as sharing a degree of similarity to some

o intereses legítimos véase Facebook Inc v Usta Cafer Caso OMPI No DES2009-0006 o Citigroup Inc Citibank N.A v Ravi Gurnani Gurnani Caso OMPI No DES2006-0001 Y así lo ha hecho La falta de contestación a la Demanda impide que el Demandado

with related services citing Facebook Inc v Privacy Limited Disclosed Agent for YOLAPT WIPO Case No D2007-1193 ii The services which have been provided by the Respondent through the Respondent s website could be seen by some as sharing a degree of

in support of the decision in Facebook Inc v Privacy Ltd Disclosed Agent for YOLAPT WIPO Case No D2007-1193 Third the Respondent is located in a territory namely Turkey covered by the Complainants two CTM registrations which predate creation of the

in support of the decision in Facebook Inc v Privacy Ltd Disclosed Agent for YOLAPT WIPO Case No D2007-1193 5.A.5 As to use in bad faith the Complainants points to the use made of the disputed domain name which as noted in paragraph 4.B.1 above is

No DES2009-0020 o en el caso Facebook Inc v Usta Cafer Caso OMPI No DES2009-0006 Y en la misma línea se muestran los expertos que aplican la UDRP en la que se inspira el Reglamento por ejemplo casos Soria Natural SA y Vicenc Roig Ribas Caso OMPI

contention the decision in Facebook Inc v Privacy Ltd Disclosed Agent for YOLAPT WIPO Case No D2007-1193 5.A.5 Furthermore the reference on the Respondent s website to the First Complainant s website noted in paragraph 4.B.2 above indicates the