ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Ján er anský Claim Number FA2205001995211   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA.  Respondent is Ján er anský Respondent

registration and use See Google LLC v alexandra kepelek FA2111001972818 Forum Dec 8 2021 citing State Farm Mut Auto Ins Co v Cofield FA1799574 Forum Sept 10 2018 finding bad faith under UDRP Section 4 a iii where the domain name initially

has been translated with Google Translate   This leaves internet users under the false impression that the website is owned by Complainant or one of its official licensees Respondent has posted a copyright notice specifically stating IQOS

  Google LLC v John / Gmailnator Claim Number FA2205001996702   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Fabricio Vayra of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.  Respondent is John / Gmailnator Respondent

under Policy ¶ 4 c ii   See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

MORGAN STANLEY because i a Google search for webpages that contain both the terms Morgan Stanley and MS yielded over 5 million results ii Complainant's stock has been publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol MS for

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

May 17 2022   On May 17 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the blinkifi.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

registration and use See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a ‘phishing scheme further established its bad

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v 1337 services LLC Claim Number FA2204001993917   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA.  Respondent is 1337 services LLC

May 10 2022   On May 11 2022 Google LLC confirmed by email to the Forum that the medlineindustrieslp.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

in the search engines Google and Baidu the returned results pointed to the Complainant and its business activities and not to the Respondent In addition the Complainant further contends that the disputed domain names resolved to

under Policy ¶ 4 b iv See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent's use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content constituted bad

the domain name at issue Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd Case No FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that Respondent had not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or

Respondent had carried out a Google search for the name ARCELORMITTAL the search results would have yielded immediate and obvious references to the Complainant The Panel concludes that it is difficult in those circumstances to believe that the

if it were deny it a basic Google search would have brought Complainant's INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA to its attention and the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Complainant submits as part of its evidence an

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

c ii   See Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as ‘Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in the WHOIS

known by the Domain Name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana