known by the Domain Name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

28 2022   On April 28 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the bitly.icu domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by

by a disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

added the com gTLD see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent's domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant's GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

under Policy ¶ 4 a iii  See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

submitted the results of a Google search carried out regarding the terms ADECCO and ADECCO NY all of them related to the Complainant Furthermore the disputed domain name resolves to an active website related to the Complainant and its products

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant This raises in the view of Complainant a clear inference of knowledge of the

or gefcologistics in the Google Bar to realize that all first results refer to the Complainant s websites actualities or services Consequently the actual knowledge of the Complainant's trademarks and activities at the time of the disputed

under Policy ¶ 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

constitutes bad faith See Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant's trademark suggests Respondent's bad faith see also Twitter Inc v

by a disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

industry along with Google Apple Amazon and Facebook It is also ranked third place in the Interbrand annual ranking of best global brands in 2021 The disputed domain names fixmicrosoft.com homemicrosoft.com microsofterror.com

and save content from Google's YouTube service in violation of Google's YouTube Terms of Service see also Google Inc v Onur Koycegiz FA1741705 Forum Aug 25 2017 finding that respondent's use of the 10youtube.com domain name in association

opportunistic bad faith Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the Google LLC registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain disputes

under Policy ¶ 4 b iv   See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent's inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

opportunistic bad faith Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

mark under Policy ¶ 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

of Facebook and second to Google Complainant and its affiliates currently employ over 1 300 people with offices in New York Los Angeles London Paris Madrid Berlin Mexico City Tel Aviv New Delhi and so forth   Complainant owns the following word

domain name Besides all the Google results of a search of the terms STADE TOULOUSAIN refers to the rugby club managed by the Complainant On those facts the Complainant claims that the use of the Complainant s trademark in the disputed domain name