under the Policy see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent had actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

s trademark MAJE and a Google search for the term maje results in the multiple search results linked to the Complainant Furthermore the choice to add the term outlet to the trademark MAJE is even likely to increase the likelihood of

it provides evidence that a Google search of the ziprecruiter term lists the Complainant s brand and services as the first result Accordingly the Complainant affirms that the registration of the Disputed Domain Name was done in connection with

search carried out using Google search engine in Japan with crouzet as a key word returned a number of references to the Complainant and its distributors in Japan and none relating to the Respondent In the premises the Panel is satisfied that

as Facebook Youtube Instagram Google and Twitter The Complainant is the owner of numerous trademark registrations for STAR STABLE in particular said trademark appears to be protected in European Union and in the United States of America Furthermore

¶ 4 c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

provide a positive signal to Google that this website is authoritative and should have its content ranked higher than lesser competing websites These old backlinks do not provide any traffic to the website The use of VELUX in the Disputed Domain

under the Policy see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 19 2020 On February 19 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

March 2018 According to the Google Play store the game Asphalt 9 Legends has been downloaded more than ten million times on Android mobile devices Complainant owns inter alia the following trademarks European Union Trademark ASPHALT 9 LEGENDS

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 17 2020 On February 17 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

mark under Policy ¶ 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant's mark does not remove the respondent's domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

Respondent s address and a Google search of the Respondent only produces the Respondent s website or the Complainant s own websites Moreover the Respondent alleges to have been established since 1994 and claims to have offices in four countries

another address according to Google results For the purpose of proving fraud Complainant also claims that Respondent is referred in a White Paper communicated in the Annexes to the Complaint as being a trading company in Manchester England In

18 2020   On March 19 2020 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the cardinelhealth.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

FORUM   DECISION   Google LLC v Walter Lafky Claim Number FA2003001888604   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Brendan J Hughes of Cooley LLP District of Columbia.  Respondent is Walter Lafky Respondent Oregon

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on January 14 2020 On January 14 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

under Policy ¶ 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

of the first 5 pages of a Google search which give a very detailed exposition on the word polytech and its derivative polytechnic They both have a variety of meanings but particularly related to education educational institutions industry and

First it is notorious that Google search results vary widely depending on when where and by whom the search is undertaken A Google search on the same terms conducted by the Panel on the date of this decision returned very different results