FORUM     DECISION   Google LLC v Him News Claim Number FA2001001881581   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Brendan J Hughes of Cooley LLP District of Columbia United States.  Respondent is Him News Respondent

after conducting USPTO and Google searches for the name Ridgeline neither of which returned anything suggesting law services.  It began at that time to use the Domain Name to promote its noncompeting law practice.  It did not develop a web site

AERO and VODOCHODY in the Google search engine the returned results pointed to the Complainant s business activities only The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the disputed domain name and would have

per Policy ¶ 4 a iii   See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a ‘phishing scheme further established its bad

demonstrates bad faith See Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant's trademark indicates Respondent's bad faith   As such the Panelist

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Complainant submited an extract of a Google search in support of its allegation

It also exhibits some Google search results for williams signal and williamssignal though the Panel is unclear what point these go to they appear to confirm what the Complainant said about such results Finally it concludes by saying w e are

sont enregistrés auprès de Google LLC ci-après désigné l Unité d enregistrement 3 Rappel de la procédure Une plainte a été déposée par la Banque Fédérale du Crédit Mutuel BFCM auprès du Centre d arbitrage et de médiation de l

already listed as the second Google search result in Annex 10 of the original Complaint and therefore clearly in existence at that time although it was not filed with the original Complaint The documents in Exhibits 2 to 4 of the supplemental

per Policy ¶ 4 a iii   See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a ‘phishing scheme further established its bad

en el motor de búsqueda Google no hay resultados que indiquen relación alguna entre éste y la marca AUTOPLAZA Que los únicos resultados de la búsqueda anterior se relacionan con la presente disputa o con artículos que hablan de la

en el motor de búsqueda Google no hay resultados que indiquen relación alguna entre éste y la marca AUTOPLAZA Que al realizar una búsqueda por titular de registros de marcas a través del sistema de libre acceso Marcanet el único

are registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 13 2019 On December 13 2019 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

and use per Policy ¶ 4 b iv Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent's inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

cool water and man in the Google search engine the returned results all point to the Complainant and its business activities The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the Disputed Domain Name and would have

the disputed domain name The Google search results for the disputed domain name valerogroup.com include a LinkedIn page of Rene Rozados Rene J Valero group corp employee in the Caracas area Venezuela 5 Parties Contentions A Complainant The

¶ 4 c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

use per Policy ¶ 4 b iv See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent's use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content constituted bad

FORUM     DECISION   Google LLC v Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot Claim Number FA2001001879161   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Brendan J Hughes of Cooley LLP District of Columbia United States. 

is reconfirmed by an ordinary Google search with pretty much all top search results exclusively pointing to into the direction of Complaint and its NATIXIS trademark Against this background it is indeed rather likely than not that Respondent was