under the Policy see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

Policy �� 4 c i or iii See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair use

� 4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

10 2020 � On January 13 2020 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the postmates-fleet.net domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

and use per Policy � 4 b iv Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent's inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

of the domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

6 2020 � On January 7 2020 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the morganstlanley.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.� Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

a webpage purporting to be a Google store security check and to a webpage displaying hyperlinks to supermarkets operated by the Complainant or a competitor of the Complainant 5 Parties Contentions A Complainant The disputed domain name is

� DECISION � Google LLC v Ivan Petrov Claim Number FA2001001878918 � PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA Respondent is Ivan Petrov Respondent Russian Federation �

operates the widely used GOOGLE search engine and offers other products and services Complainant's GOOGLE mark ranks among the world's most valuable global brands Complainant owns numerous trademark registrations for GOOGLE and related marks

Vid en sökning på Google efter camping4u leder de mest relevanta sökresultaten till Sökandens webbshop och först på femte och sjätte plats leder sökresultatet till Innehavaren Innehavaren är ett tyskt företag utan fysisk butik

Policy �� 4 b iii and iv �See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent's inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

of Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world The Panel

shown rights in the GOOGLE and GOOGLE FLIGHTS marks per Policy � 4 a i � Complainant argues that Respondent's googleflightshtml.com domain name is nearly identical or confusingly similar to Complainant's GOOGLE and GOOGLE FLIGHTS marks

the term ccleaner into the Google search engine the results point to Complainant and its business activities and Respondent could easily have performed a similar search before registering the disputed domain name He would then quickly have

demonstrates bad faith See Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant's trademark indicates Respondent's bad faith � As such the Panelist

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

are registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 2 2019 On December 3 2019 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

to English as provided by Google translation tool The Complainant and its predecessor have not authorised the Respondent to use the mark AVG or to provide a service as purportedly promoted on the Respondent's website   No administratively

� 4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS