world including the USPTO See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

to email Instagram facebook google WebMD Vitals YouTube and others through not just Respondent's personal accounts but also through one or more of her aliases   The Panel notes that Complainant's allegations some of which relating to the Disputed

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Stivan Tanev Claim Number FA2204001993770   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA.  Respondent is Stivan Tanev Respondent

in English   On April 10 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the twitter-verification.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that

YOUR BALANCE bracelets from Google searches advertisements for Complainant's goods found on social media and a certification from Mark Izen Complainant's manager   However Complainant has not provided any evidence to show that it has established

that respondent's use of Google AdSense for Domains to generate revenue by the use of advertising was not a legitimate noncommercial or fair use   Complainant further contends that Respondent's use of a misspelling of the trademark SYSTIMAX by

as well as results for Google and Bing searches of the trademark Complainant also sustains in its additional submission that it has common law rights in the disputed domain name because it has been using its mark since January 2018 and has

that all of the results of a Google search of the terms BOURSORAMA refers to Complainant Besides Complainant contends that the fact that Respondent has incorporated a famous trademark into a domain name but has not demonstrated any activity in

under Policy ¶ 4 a iii See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a ‘phishing scheme further established its bad

names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the Google LLC registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain disputes brought

name's resolving website See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

by a disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

All the results of a Google search of the terms BOURSORAMAMA BANQUE refers to the Complainant Thus the Respondent has registered and used the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark Furthermore the disputed

with the results of a Google Search report for the terms SERVIER and SERVIERC where in both cases the top-ranked results relate to the Complainant Based on those elements the Panel is of the opinion that Respondent knew or should have known

the term daniellington in the Google search engine the returned results point to the Complainant and its business activities In the present case the Respondent failed to file an administratively compliant Response in which it could have provided

evidence that even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA GRUPPO INTESA and GRUPPO INTESA SANPAOLO would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant and that the Complainant owns numerous domain names incorporating its

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 16 2022 On February 16 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

zanussi-serv The results of a Google search of said term are mostly referred to the Complainant s ZANUSSI Mark There is no evidence that the Respondent owns any identical or similar trademarks to the Disputed Domain Name or to the term zanussi-serv

Respondent had carried out Google search for the name BOURSORAMA the search results would have yielded immediate and obvious references to the Complainant It is therefore reasonable to infer that the Respondent either knew or should have known