E-Leclerc Mont-de-Marsan on Google B Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant s contentions 6 Discussion and Findings According to paragraph 4 a of the Policy for this Complaint to succeed in relation to the Domain Name the

13 2019 � On November 14 2019 Google LLC confirmed by email to the Forum that the tdbankgroup.net domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant's mark does not remove the respondent's domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

en el motor de búsqueda de Google disponible en www.google.com y www.google.es se refieren exclusivamente a las Demandantes Los nombres de dominio en disputa son confusamente similares a las marcas WHATSAPP e INSTAGRAM de las Demandantes Los 9

bearing to be on behalf of Google LLC and targeted to Google customers and/or in some way connected to a telecommunications company named SingTel Optus Pty Limited second a typical pay-per-click website featuring generic advertisements not

�4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

under the Policy see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

under Policy � 4 a iii See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a �phishing scheme further established its bad

an online interview using the Google Hangouts chat feature.� Complaint Exhibit F-6 is a screenshot of this item As described above it displays a message from a Linda Pope explaining that the visitor has been found to qualify for employment with

� 4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

under the Policy see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

the terms COURIR in the Google search engine the returned results all point to the Complainant and its business activity There is no evidence showing that the Respondent s use of the disputed domain name is in connection with a bona fide

and eighty-three thousand Google search results for umusic experience and all of the results on the first page relate to the services of Complainant There are thousands of references to Complainant's UMUSIC EXPERIENCE goods and services on

that has been blocked by Google Safe Browsing The main purpose of the Respondent was to use the above website for phishing financial information in an attempt to defraud the Complainant s customers RESPONDENT The Respondent did not reply to

WIPO Case No D2004-0322 Google indicates the existence of the Complainant s long term activity under the name IVORY RESEARCH The Complainant s website indeed appears as the first results on Google search tool with the keyword IVORY RESEARCH

� 4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

October 29 2019 according to Google s cache of the website The disputed domain name resolved to a generic lorem ipsum placeholder page in mixed Chinese and English text as of November 15 2019 and to a blank webpage with no content except a title

submits that even a basic Google search in respect of the words INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Complainant submits in an annex to the Complaint an extract of a Google search in support of

Names are registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on October 8 2019 On October 9 2019 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a