Moon LLC    Registrars Google Inc EXAMINER    The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding   

baihama and baihama into the Google search engine produces prompts asking if the user intended to search tommy bahama and bahama respectively Accordingly the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has

WIPO Case No D2004-0962 Google Inc v Nijat Hassanov WIPO Case No D2011-1054 In view of the above the Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has met the requirements under paragraph 4 a i of the Policy B Rights or Legitimate Interests While

as Facebook Youtube Instagram Google and Twitter The Disputed Domain Name was created on May 30 2019 and is being used in connection with a website where as described by Complainant Star Stable players are invited to use Respondent s software to

ivoryresearch.com web site google search results screen shot from web archive relating to the ivoryresearch.com web site from 2009 agreements for the ivoryresearch.com domain name transfer However the Complainant does not explain its relations

under the Policy see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

under Policy � 4 a iii �See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

Name This is evidenced by a Google News search limited to websites with a connection to the Netherlands Complainant recently incorporated a new entity Prosus N.V Prosus and transferred most of its Internet businesses to that new entity

electrolux site en Google 5 Alegaciones de las Partes A Demandante La Demandante sostiene en la Demanda Que debido a la inversión realizada por la Demandante en distribución y publicidad la marca ELECTROLUX ha adquirido renombre a

the disputed domain name ii A Google search of the terms PENTAIR and CHINA as well as EVERPURE and CHINA returns results that point to Pentair s Group and its business activity The Respondent could easily have performed a similar search before

INTRUM in the search engines Google and Baidu the majority of the results point to webpages about the Complainant The Complainant contends that before registering the disputed domain name the Respondent could have performed a similar search and

name and that mark �See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant's mark does not remove the respondent's domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

a trademark assignment with Google the original registrant of the mark around the world including with the United States Patent and Trademark Office USPTO e.g Reg No 5 235 699 registered Jul 4 2017 Respondent's vir�stotal.com domain name is

рекламы Google AdSense показывающий доход в сумме 7033 87 долларов США полученный от размещения рекламы на вебсайте Google AdSense это

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on September 14 2019 On September 16 2019 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar

the terms eutelsat in the Google search engine the returned results pointed to the Complainant s business activities only The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the disputed domain name and would have

the disputed domain name �See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

1 2019 � On November 04 2019 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the teledynee.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.� Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

a finding of bad faith See Google LLC v Eunice Hsieh / INAYOSHI DIGITAL MARKETING CO LTD FA 1869451 Forum Nov 25 2019 The use of false Whois information obscures the registrant's true identity and constitutes further evidence of Respondent's bad

aussi qu une recherche sur Google pour les termes europ à rebrise plus ne renvoie à aucun résultat autre que ceux qui font référence au nom de domaine europarebriseplus.fr La Commission administrative estime donc qu il est plus que probable