has common law rights in the GOOGLE FLIGHTS mark Respondent s googleflightssearch.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE and GOOGLE FLIGHTS mark as Respondent s domain name incorporates Complainant s marks in its entirety

Compl Annex 10 Respondent s googlebooking.com domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark Respondent has entirely incorporated Complainant s GOOGLE mark and merely added the descriptive term booking along with the

de una simple búsqueda en Google o Wikipedia del término �Ternium � los únicos resultados arrojados hacen referencia a las Promoventes Que la Titular no está haciendo un uso legítimo y leal o no comercial del nombre de dominio en disputa

Name � is registered with Google LLC the �Registrar � 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on June 21 2019 On June 21 2019 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

is registered with Google LLC the �Registrar � 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on June 19 2019 On June 20 2019 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

as for example set by Google �s Advertising Policy � and contends that �Respondent �s use of the Domain Name for key word purposes and redirection to another domain name is commonly accepted practice globally � Finally the Respondent

4 c ii See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

shown rights in the GOOGLE mark per Policy Paragraph 4 a i Complainant argues that Respondent s google-phone-numbers.com and google-search-ip.com domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark Respondent adds the terms

as in this case did submit a Google search results for �Netbank � but elected not to in this case In this case they did submit Google search results for �Nedbank � This evidence is that many companies around the world use �netbank � The

� in a search engine such as Google revealed on its first pages only hits of websites where broadcasting services of the Complainant are offered The Panel is therefore convinced that the Respondent was aware of the Complainant when it registered

Google LLC v Farid Shahidinejad Claim Number FA1907001853508 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA Respondent is Farid Shahidinejad Respondent Arizona USA

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

July 18 2019 On July 18 2019 Google LLC confirmed by email to the Forum that the arantfox.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by

July 11 2019 On July 12 2019 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the googleadsense.net domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

cited above See e.g Google LLC v Denis Rocha / Agencia G Suite FA 1837072 Forum May 3 2019 finding bad faith registration and use in similar circumstances The Panel so finds DECISION Having considered the three elements required under the

Turkish into English using Google Translate D2019 1431 stalker insta.com well known non public facing �and feel self compromising good faith D2014 1564 look and D2018 0078 1700 instgrm org stalker-insta com webinstaa Name instagram �www dk in ae

name a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword �michelin � demonstrates that all first results relate to Complainant �s products or news In this age of the Internet and advancement in information technology the

by the fact that from a Google search it follows that the contact e-mail 731562@qq.com which is used as a contact e-mail on the Respondent s website at the domain name in question for the purpose of purchasing the domain is used as a contact

ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Google LLC v �'鑫 Shu Xin Case No D2019-1990 1 The Parties The Complainant is Google LLC United States of America USA represented by Cooley LLP USA The Respondent is �'鑫 Shu Xin China 2 The Domain Name and