Bad Faith Having conducted a Google search against the term chicopee the Panel finds no evidence that the term is a dictionary word in common usage or that it has any meaning in commerce other than to refer to the Complainants trademark and

consumers � and � c urrently Google shows a monthly search volume of 1000 for fcukyou � brand name � In view of Respondent �s concession a day after registering the disputed domain name that Complainant �s FCUK brand is well-known it strains

Go to http //us.org/Search Google for skechers outlet org.ERR NAME NOT RESOLVED An inactive holding of a disputed domain name is not a bona fide offering of goods or services pursuant to Policy Paragraph 4 c i and it is not a legitimate

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

of Policy Paragraph 4 c iii Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair use

4 c ii See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

c ii See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

Name � is registered with Google LLC the �Registrar � 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on June 13 2019 On June 14 2019 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

An Internet search using the Google search engine immediately shows the Complainant �s AGFA mark The Respondent has registered the disputed domain name to give the impression that it is affiliated with the Complainant or is endorsed by it B

Paragraph 4 c i or iii See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair use

claims that he has data from Google going back to March before this dispute was filed that shows he is using the Domain Name for pest control services The Respondent claims that the data Google provides also shows that none of the visitors to the

c ii See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

website does not appear in a Google search provided by Complainant Respondent makes no legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name as domain names identical to trademarks carry a high risk of implied affiliation and Respondent has not

by typing these terms in Google �s search engine available at �www.google.com � and �www.google.ro � refer to the Complainant The Complainant informs the Panel that on January 22 2019 and February 4 2019 two cease and desist letters were sent

Pay 2014 Android Pay now Google Pay 2015 and Samsung Pay 2015 were widely known before the Respondent registered the disputed domain name iii Jumia was a quickly developing supranational African business and had the potential to become an

Name � is registered with Google LLC the �Registrar � 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on June 13 2019 On June 13 2019 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

an active web site but to a Google page warning the users of the misleading web site should the users attempt to see the contents the web site appeared to be inactive The disputed domain name unicredit-bacheca.net was not redirected to an active

search engines such as Google lists Complainant �s brand and services as the first result Moreover any average Internet user has access to ASHLEY MADISON trademark registrations as they can be found on public trademark databases Also

s use of the same see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

Name � is registered with Google LLC the �Registrar � 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on May 28 2019 On May 29 2019 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a