with Complainant as a cursory Google search would easily reveal the name GORGONZOLA evokes immediately the Complainant s trademark as used for a cheese Italian and European authorities have recognized Complainant s rights on the trademark

the domain name at issue Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

18 2022   On Mar 21 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the twitter-self.com and twitter-secure.com domain names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names Google LLC has

¶¶ 4 c i or iii see also Google Inc v Alex Dori FA 1623672 Forum July 13 2015 Given that Respondent is using the disputed domain name to offer illegal content for download and streaming the Panel finds that Respondent's use of the disputed

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 8 2022 On February 8 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

for NUXE and online in the Google and Baidu leading search engine in China search engines the returned results pointed to the Complainant and its business activities Laboratoire Nuxe has never been contacted by someone willing to register the

similar to MASS SAVE Google Inc v Amcore & Co For Sale Domains 250 or Best Offer FA 267534 Forum June 21 2004 finding googlers.com confusingly similar to GOOGLE The Panel considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to a

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

  Google LLC v Mohammadreza Ahmadi Claim Number FA2204001991748   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Griffin Barnett of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.  Respondent is Mohammadreza Ahmadi Respondent

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Xetcom Portal Claim Number FA2203001989501   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by James R Davis II of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.  Respondent is Xetcom Portal

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Xetcom Portal Claim Number FA2203001988800   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by James R Davis II of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.  Respondent is Xetcom Portal

use under Policy ¶ 4 b iv See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent's use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content constituted bad

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

18 2022   On March 18 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the mcguirewoodsdc.com Domain Name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

trademark agencies.  See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world  

mark under Policy ¶ 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

under Policy ¶ 4 a iii See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum August 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a ‘phishing scheme further established its

¶¶ 4 c i or iii see also Google Inc v Alex Dori FA 1623672 Forum July 13 2015 Given that Respondent is using the disputed domain name to offer illegal content for download and streaming the Panel finds that Respondent's use of the disputed

Annex 7 shows that a simple Google search of the word Michelin produced results that relate only to Complainant.  On this evidence and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary the Panel finds that Respondent is not the owner or beneficiary