Name � is registered with Google LLC the �Registrar � 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on April 4 2019 On April 5 2019 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

and that a search on Google for �capitec app � produces results which on the first page at least all reference the Complainant provides further support for this assertion Accordingly the Respondent �s registration of the disputed domain

is registered with Google LLC the �Registrar � 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on April 15 2019 On April 16 2019 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

Pixel 3 when you purchase at Google Store � �Se acabó renunciar a la calidad tan solo el precio � �Bolsos Calvin Klein Outlet El bolso es uno de los complementos más especiales por ese motivo Calvin Klein cuenta con un gran número de diseños

�s fame is exaggerated as a Google search for �carcam � does not reveal any reference to the Complainant or its products on the first pages the disputed domain name was registered on July 22 1996 nearly sixteen years before the Complainant

search engines like Yahoo and Google would have shown that MOBILCOM is a trademark The Panel thus concludes that Respondent has registered this Domain Name to prevent Complainant from reflecting its mark in the corresponding com Domain Name and

s use of the same see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

Pete Indeed a search on the Google search engine for ST PETE SOFTWARE results in a page listing other tech companies in the greater St Petersburg Florida area a Yelp.com posting for the best software development companies in the area Indeed.com

suggests an affiliation See Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

displaying the logo of Google and purportedly providing rewards e.g smart phones to Google users The Domain Name also previously pointed to a parking page containing sponsored links At the time of drafting the Decision the Domain Name

s use of the same see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

s use of the same see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

s use of the same see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

apps were downloaded from GOOGLE s PLAY STORE o In 2011 about 10 billion apps were downloaded from GOOGLE s PLAY STORE o In 2012 approximately 25 billion apps were downloaded from GOOGLE s PLAY STORE o In 2013 around 50 billion apps were

WIPO Case No D2004-0962 Google Inc v Nijat Hassanov WIPO Case No D2011-1054 In view of the above the Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has met the requirements under paragraph 4 a i of the Policy B Rights or Legitimate Interests The

Road Registry Inc Registrars Google LLC EXAMINER The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding Tuukka Ilkka

can confidently appeal to Google DMCA by Google DMCA-notice tool If they are correct Google will permanently delete my Website on the search engine otherwise it is just their personal opinion that everything they think is right The Panel will

s use of the same see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

support these assertions See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana