Policy Paragraph 4 c ii See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding under Policy Paragraph 4 c ii that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name where the relevant WHOIS

20 2019 On February 21 2019 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the vldyo.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the

s use of the same see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

considering the money from Google Ads The Disputed Domain Name was purchased with the intention to publish beauty pageants happening around the world and not in bad faith 6 Discussion and Findings To succeed the Complainants must demonstrate

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Prisma Singh/Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 As such the Panelist finds that the Respondent does not have rights or a legitimate interest in the Domain Name and that the

s use of the same see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

and using the domain name See Google Inc v James Lucas FA1605757 Forum April 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an example of bad faith pursuant Policy Paragraph 4 b iv

has provided evidence that a Google search conducted using the global version of google.com discloses 286 000 results amongst which the Complainant s site is not at all notable or prominent The Respondent notes that Google search advertising that

mark Complainant provides a Google Search of the RADIO MARIA mark in support of its contentions The Panel finds that Respondent had actual knowledge of Complainant s rights in the mark and thus registered the disputed domain name in bad faith

s use of the same see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

s use of the same see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

s use of the same see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

14 2019 On February 18 2019 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the layfieldgr0up.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

is registered with Google Inc the �Registrar � 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on January 28 2019 On January 28 2019 the Center transmitted by email to the

14 2019 On February 18 2019 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the homedepotdesigncenter.net homedepotdesigncenter.org and homedepot-designcenter.com domain names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current

Google LLC v nathalie denefle Claim Number FA1902001831627 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Jonathan S Batchelor of Dickson Wright PLLC Arizona USA Respondent is nathalie denefle Respondent France REGISTRAR AND

of the same Screenshots of Google search results for Banca Sanpaolo A letter from Complainant to Respondent dated 17 January 2019 requesting transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant Various WIPO ADR decisions concerning similar

of the domain positions in Google �s ranking � The Complainant responded saying it would only reimburse direct out-of-pocket acquisition costs On December 4 2019 the Respondent sent a further email replying to a second cease-and-desist letter

carried even a basic Google search in respect of the words intesa and intesa sanpaolo the search would have yielded obvious references to Complainant Complainant submits as Annex G to the Complaint an extract of a Google search in support

s use of the same see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana