on May 30 2018 On May 31 2018 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the solarturbinesworldwide.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that

and Respondent s placement on Google ads in an attempt to deceive Internet users into believing Respondent is Complainant or an authorized agent See Compl Ex D Accordingly the Panel finds that the Respondent lacks rights and legitimate interests in

notes that all the results on Google of this term are related to Complainant Complainant states that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant �s Trade Mark as it contains Complainant �s Trade Mark in its entirety with the exception of

name a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword �michelin � demonstrates that all first results relate to Complainant �s products or news In this day and age of the Internet and advancement in information

registered with the Registrar Google Inc The disputed domain name elllottmqmt.com is registered with the Registrar Ascio Technologies Inc 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on

the USA including CITIBANK GOOGLE NORDSTROM and WALMART seeing that it is the registrant of these other domain names citiabnk.com googlemas.com mnordstrom.com and walmartusa.com These are strong indications that the Respondent is able to

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

disputed domain name See e.g Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 Complainant asserts that given the widespread use of Complainant s mark and the fact that Respondent registered the disputed domain name incorporating Complainant s

a domain name a simple Google search or any other search engine using the keyword �Michelin � demonstrates that all first results relate to Complainant �s products or news In this day and age of the Internet and advancement in information

demo data and I also tested google ads and banner ads during that time in order to test this theme Going forward I will assure none of the said ads will be used in future for this blog � 6 Discussion and Findings Preliminary Matters The Panel

the at-issue domain name See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair use

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Forum Sept 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph 4 b iv Complainant

A Complainant 1 Respondent s google-ch.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark 2 Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the google-ch.com domain name 3 Respondent registered and uses the

sur le moteur de recherches Google figurant au dossier Annexe I de la plainte avance sans être contredit que le Défendeur n �a aucune relation avec le Requérant qui ne lui a concédé aucune autorisation d �enregistrer et d �utiliser le nom de

of the domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

pages at JeffLindsay.com with Google ads etc FACTUAL AND LEGAL GROUNDS a Specify in the space below the manner in which the domain name s is/are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights

contains an embedded link for Google AdSense indicating that the page is enabled for monetization through this platform In addition the Domain Name is advertised for sale through the domain name registration data which refers to the registrant as

1 e g online Complainant s google

� in a search engine such as Google revealed only the Complainant �s business on the first pages The Panel is therefore convinced that the Respondent was aware of the Complainant when it registered the disputed domain name and that the VOLKSWAGEN