third party use evidenced by Google search HP Hood LLC v Hood.com No 313566 NAF Oct 20 2004 Several panels have noted that the more descriptive a mark the more difficult becomes Complainant s burden of proof to establish registration and use with

Complainant submits that a Google search for the term JAGA results in multiple search results linked to Complainant Also at the time of registration of the disputed domain name 1998 Complainant had already a well-known business presence in the

Road Registry Inc Registrars Google LLC EXAMINER The undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding Fernando Triana Esq as

Respondent on the Baidu and Google search engines In circumstances where the Complainant possesses exclusive rights to the YSL trade mark whereas the Respondent seems to have no trade mark rights the Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has

onto users computers see also Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent s apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a phishing scheme further established its bad

on May 16 2018 On May 17 2018 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the herritagehome.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

Twitter YouTube LinkedIn and Google The disputed domain name was registered on April 14 2012 and redirects to a parking page containing links including Free Web Browsers Download Mozilla Firefox Download Latest Firefox Firefox for Mac The disputed

� as a search term in the Google search engine Google treats that term as the equivalent of the term �wikipedia � Therefore the Panel finds that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar as outlined in paragraph 4 a i of the Policy B

under the Policy see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA 1591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant s

s RIP-OFF REPORT mark Google Inc v Ravi Mani No FA1006001330290 Nat Arb Forum July 21 2010 Hewlett-Packard Co v Zuccarini FA94454 Nat Arb Forum May 30 2000 finding the domain name hewlitpackard.com confusingly similar to the HEWLETT-PACKARD

the well-known search engine Google with the keywords INTESA SANPAOLO that had the Respondent performed a basic search on Google he should have yielded obvious references the Complainant Hence according to the Complainant it is most likely that

consisten en la denominación GOOGLE y ADWORDS Marcas GOOGLE Marcas de la Unión Europea �MUE � No.4316642 GOOGLE solicitada el 29 de marzo de 2005 y concedida el 18 de abril de 2006 para las clases 16 25 y 35 No 1104306 GOOGLE solicitada el 12 de

networks LinkedIn YouTube Google and Instagram The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical to its trademark since the Top-Level Domain �.com � is irrelevant when determining whether a disputed domain name is identical or

of its Facebook Twitter and Google pages With regard to the requirement of identity or confusing similarity between the trademark and the domain name pursuant to paragraph 4 a i of the Policy the Complainant submits that the disputed domain name

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

Complainant s rights see also Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA 1726692 Forum May 16 2017 finding that the mere existence of a disclaimer on a webpage is not sufficient to confer rights and legitimate interests in a disputed domain

on May 9 2018 On May 9 2018 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the thorequlties.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

evidence in the form of Google email snapshots showing past use of @mecho.com email addresses for the sending and receipt of emails and historical literature showing that Mecho is indeed a common nickname in the Dominican Republic to

time of registration See also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant