Rules according to which a Google research for �Virgin Galactic � provides search results the vast majority of which among the 50 top search results point exclusively to Virgin Galactic LLC and its spaceflight business The Panel therefore is

email address search on Google gave no results The Panel finds that given the circumstances the Respondent cannot have rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name The Respondent is neither affiliated nor connected to the Complainant in

Respondent performed a simple Google search it would have been presented with numerous search results relating and/or referring to Complainant and the existence of Complainant s rights in the RICOH mark Bad faith use The use of a confusingly

type googling.com instead of google.com even though �googling � is a word The Complainant must show that the Respondent registered the disputed domain names in bad faith based on the registration date and in light of the other similar domains

of a disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

Paragraph 4 b iv see also Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant s trademark suggests Respondent s bad faith As noted above Complainant

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent s apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a phishing scheme further established its bad

the trademark registrations a Google search and the size of Complainant �it seems unlikely that the Respondent was unaware of the Complainant �s activities and of the existence of the trademarks and domain names NATIXIS � at the time the

Paragraph4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum August 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world iv See Altec

We have raised the matter to Google Play and requested the application name to be changed back to Nautics Sailmate � to avoid infringing with our trademark We raise this matter to the Panel as the Respondent was using the fact its application was

undertaken an image search on Google for the term �Hardox Wear Plate � Both of these exercises reveal that the Complainant uses a stylised logo for �Hardox Wear Plate � in upper case which consistently comprises specific purple and white colouring

Persian into English using Google �s website translation facility One page contains in translation the words �Iran Kopco � in conjunction with the statement �Provider of all compressed air products of Atlas Copco Belgium in Iran The same page

www.novartis.com.cn As per Google Translator pages provided by Complainant Nuòhuá is the alphabetical version in pinyin modern chinese language of the 诺华 characters meaning NOVARTIS Complainant successfully defended the NOVARTIS trademark

resultado en el buscador Google refuerzan tal conclusión errónea Igualmente la utilización de la extensión �.org � tradicionalmente destinada a páginas de finalidad no lucrativa incrementa la probabilidad de error Que el Demandado se

includes press articles and Google interest data as well as traffic statistics showing about 500000 visits of the website over a 30-day period between December 2017 and January 2018 The Complainant therefore submits that its website enjoys a

from Persian to English using Google �s website translation facility One such page features the Complainant �s logo on the left hand side and on the right is a section of text headed in translation �Compressor Components � with a sub-heading �Atlas

and its mark and 6 Google Chrome is warning that the website associated with the disputed domain name is a �deceptive site ahead � Complainant requests the Panel to direct the Registrar to transfer the disputed domain name to Complainant

diverting Internet traffic A Google search on the word �dessange � displays several results which are related to the Complainant The disputed domain name resolves to a parking page which shows that the Respondent has not made demonstrable

diverting Internet traffic A Google search on the word �dessange � displays several results which are related to the Complainant The disputed domain name resolves to a parking page which shows that the Respondent has not made demonstrable

since that date and a Google Analytics report evidencing activity at the website �www.ultius.com � since at least 2012 The Complainant also provides evidence of promotional expenditure dating back to February 2012 The Complainant contends