four screenshots from its Google AdWords account having redacted certain information which it says is unrelated to this matter The Respondent notes that Google does not permit the use of more than one AdWords account for a specific website and

name syntax requires TLDs See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

SUCURI urlQuery and a Google transparency report Use of a disputed domain name to either download malicious software or target users personal information is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

org �www google d b a and or

México � en el motor de Google arroja resultados relacionados con la marca BERONIA y los productos amparados por ésta los cuales se comercializan por la Promovente en México y la Unión Europea Al registrar el nombre de dominio en disputa

by it into English using Google �s website translation facility show further uses of the Complainant �s logo These include a page on which underneath the Complainant �s trade mark a number of buttons containing text are arranged laterally

the use made of it see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

�s AMUNDI trademark All Google search results for the term �amundi � relate to the Complainant The disputed domain name since its registration is parked at a page with PPC links related to the Complainant and its activity The Respondent has

is registered with Google Inc the �Registrar � 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on March 8 2018 On March 8 2018 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

clients See Compl Ex C · Google search results for UntitledEnt displays as the number one result Complainant s website See Compl Ex D As a result and on this evidence the Panel finds that Complainant has common law rights to its UNTITLED

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant s trademark suggests Respondent s bad faith Upon alerting the

in a domain name see also Google Inc v S S / Google International FA 1625742 Forum Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in the

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum April 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

had carried out even a basic Google search in respect of the word PEUTEREY the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant Furthermore the Complainant argues that the main aspect to take into consideration in order to establish

as a dangerous website by Google Safe Browsing and showed a warning to users when they attempted to navigate to the website Currently the disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website 5 Parties Contentions A Complainant The

with a search engine such as Google leads in the first place to websites relating to the Complainant and its products iv the Respondent was fully aware of the Complainant �s prior rights and registered the disputed domain name for the sole purpose

Annex J According to the Google Maps web site there is no 201 North Broadway in Miami Florida and the zip code 33801 is for Lakeland Florida not Miami See Complaint Annexes P and Q Later Respondent listed his address as 201 North Broadway in

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

Paragraph4 c iii see also Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair