to his enterprises and that a Google search of Raj Soin includes over 10000 hits that relate to him the College of Business that bears his name and/or his business Thus the evidence establishes a sufficient nexus between the name itself and its use

19 2018 On March 20 2018 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the cargillincorp.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC verified that Respondent is bound by

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Forum Sept 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph 4 b iv see also

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

4 a i iv See for example Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the word mark INTESA SANPAOLO the results would have yielded references to the Complainant This raises a clear inference of knowledge of the Complainant s trademark on the part of the

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

gmailbeta.com gogoogle.biz googlelivemail.com googlermail.com googlermail.net oogle.biz androidone.biz and youtubesketches.com registered with GoDaddy.com LLC gmailbiz.com and youtubein.com registered with Name.com Inc and yutube.download

a search on the name avast in Google all results refer to the Complainant Secondly the fact that despite the activity carried out by the Respondent is different from that of the Complainant financial trading vs antivirus software the fact that the

Paragraph 4 c i and iii See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair use

12 2006 and has rights in the GOOGLE PLAY mark based upon registration with China s State Administration for Industry and Commerce SAIC e.g Reg No 11383999 registered Jan 21 2014 Complainant has common law rights in the GOOGLE PLAY SERVICES mark

Paragraph 4 c i and iii See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair use

commercial or fair use See Google Inc v Prisma Singh/Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 As such the Panelist finds that the Respondent does not have rights or a legitimate interest in the Domain Names and that the

bort � domännamnet från Google så snart Innehavaren fick kunskap om att Sökanden hade invändningar mot användningen via Google Innehavaren kan i och för sig åter parkera domännamnet hos Google eller genomföra annan användning i ond

buscadores de Internet como Google aparece como opción sprite videojuegos de lo que se desprende que para Google tal denominación no alude exclusivamente a la marca de la Demandante ni se confunde con la misma ya que tiene otros significados

commercial mapping service Google Maps Misleading consumers about the source of counterfeit and/or infringing products and masking the location of the seller further confirm that Respondent has no legitimate basis for infringing Complainant �s

confirmed by the results of Google searches The SBK events are also widely broadcast all over the world The Respondent is an American company active in the field of cloud computing infrastructures From its website no reference to the world of

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA 1591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant s

Paragraph 4 b iii see also Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Forum Sept 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph 4 b iv Complainant