Google LLC v Aakash Khemani Claim Number FA1802001771976 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Chantal Z Hwang of Cooley LLP District of Columbia USA Respondent is Aakash Khemani Respondent India REGISTRAR AND

15 декаб� я 2017 г Google AdSense это п� ог� амма Google Inc кото� ая � аз� ешает владельцам вебсайтов в сети � азмещать � екламу контекстную � екламу от

including links related to Google keyword searches for terms such as td ameritrade options trading futures trading investment tips high yield money market stock tips dividend stocks retirement investor education This employment of the domain

www godaddy rankingthebrands google advancingtogether 2000 00 Godaddy auctions you re

Policy Paragraph 4 c ii See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 WHOIS information for the at-issue domain name lists Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp as the domain name s registrant and there is

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

in the domain name See Google LLC v Above.com Domain Privacy FA1753950 Forum Nov 14 2017 Complainant provides screenshots of the Respondent s website which contains a questionnaire for users to enter in non-personal information and an

the term Pemex into the Google search engine refer to Complainant The disputed domain name points to a website stating �Bienvenido a PEMEX.TV � and offering the disputed domain name for sale and displaying a background image of airplanes

engines like Yandex and Google The Respondent also mentioned that its �arsenal � included the possibility to increase the publicity of its articles on Youtube and gave an example in this regard The Respondent concluded that it had sufficient

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

bit ly drive google com adobe nutrisystemturbo calcuttawebdevelopers Int l postmaster twitchgo.org twitchgo.pro twitchplay.pro and or Nutri System

or legitimate interests See Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in

of a domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA 1591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant s GOOGLE mark and Respondent s use of

of Complainant s mark See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

March 7 2018 On March 7 2018 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the mattfromstatefarm.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

is registered with Google Inc the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on January 18 2018 On January 18 2018 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

a �404 error � page edited by Google Inc The Respondent configured MX servers in order to create email addresses and to use the disputed domain name for emailing purposes The Complainant was warned that two companies have been contacted by someone

from Apple iTunes or Google Play The Respondent registered the Domain Name on April 12 2017 The Domain Name is connected to a software application for online dating and matchmaking called �The League App � It also contains links to the

Trademarks in conducting a Google search the absence of awareness of the LEGO Trademarks by the Respondent is inconceivable to this Panel and this view is comforted by the evidence of the Respondent �s behavior in promoting on his website

popular search engines like Google also shows Complainant as the first hit Annex 14 to the Complaint The FREE PEOPLE trademark has now acquired recognition on both national and international level Moreover as soon as Respondent registered the