of Policy Paragraph 4 c ii Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in

legitimate business purpose A Google search did not reveal any commercial use of the disputed domain name which directs visitors to a generic page for setting up a website Complainant has not authorized registration of the disputed domain name and

his name Complainant s Google advertisements had over four million impressions as manifest by the graphs d Respondent is deliberately using scheduleflow.com to benefit from the spelling mistake which Complainant s customers commonly make

the terms FABER and INDIA on Google engine search returned results point to Complainant and its business activity The Respondent could easily perform a similar search before registering the Domain Name and would have quickly learnt that the

« HMF » and Denmark in the Google search engine the returned results point to the Complainant and its business activity only The Respondent has not by virtue of the content of the website nor by its use of the Disputed Domain Name shown that

registration and use See Google Inc v Onur Koycegiz FA1741705 Forum Aug 25 2017 finding use of the 10youtube.com domain name in association with a website that enabled download of content from Google s YouTube website in violation of Google s

any substantial results in a Google search The Respondent maintains that the Complainant currently has over 700 domain names registered in his name and contends the Complainant is in violation of the U.S Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

at Complainant or its mark Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA 1591796 Forum 2015 Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant s GOOGLE mark and Respondent s use of one

la OMPI DECISIà N DEL EXPERTO Google LLC c Dario santome Caso No DES2017-0050 1 Las Partes La Demandante es Google LLC con domicilio en Mountain View California Estados Unidos de América representada por Carlos Polo y Asociados España El

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

Policy Paragraph 4 c ii Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in

El nombre y la compañía Google fueron creados en 1997 Desde entonces el motor de búsqueda de Google se ha convertido en uno de los servicios de búsqueda de Internet más reconocidos del mundo El sitio web principal de Google se encuentra en

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

and that all of the top Google search results for fb refer to Complainant Complainant owns the fb.com domain name which it redirects to www.facebook.com along with other domain names corresponding to or incorporating its FB mark Complainant

no 1071008 natixis fr www google e g 2 1 3 0 Edmunds d b a A S

including Instagram Facebook Google and Pinterest It has been widely reported in the media and has received several awards and accolades including the 2015 Cosmopolitan Fashion Awards Best Online Offering All of these activities predate the

Respondent is located in the Google search engine the returned results point to Complainant and its business activity The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the Domain Name and would have quickly learnt that

Respondent is located in the Google search engine the returned results point to Complainant and its business activity The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the Domain Name and would have quickly learnt that