in search engines such as Google revealed on its first pages only hits related to the Complainant and its different business activities Furthermore the existence of the disclaimer is also evidence of the Respondent's awareness of the

including Instagram Facebook Google and Pinterest It has been widely reported in the media and has received several awards and accolades including the 2015 Cosmopolitan Fashion Awards Best Online Offering All of these activities predate the

Paragraph 4 c iii see also Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

common English word harmony A Google search indicates that harmoni is used as a business name by a number of entities It is not implausible that in 2003 a party unaware of the Complainant would seek to register a Domain Name consisting of the word

to the Complainant's Google enquiry chính hãng in Vietnamese means genuine in English The addition of a generic term should be found not to avoid confusing similarity to the Complainant's trademark The generic Top-Level Domain gTLD com

registration and use See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent s apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a phishing scheme further established its bad

of Policy Paragraph4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

Google LLC v Shaktidhara maharana Claim Number FA1712001761257 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Chantal Z Hwang of Cooley LLP District of Columbia USA Respondent is Shaktidhara maharana Respondent India REGISTRAR

and using the domain name See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Forum September 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names that distributed malware to Internet users computers demonstrated a respondent s bad faith registration and use under Policy

Complainant has presented a Google search on the expression INTESA SANPAOLO that provides several results all of them being linked with the Complainant As far as the gTLD com is concerned it is generally recognized that top level domains do not

constitutes bad faith See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent s apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a phishing scheme further established its bad

Paragraph 4 a iii see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

expliquant la politique de Google en matière de publicité et un message invitant les internautes à acheter le Nom de Domaine Dans ce contexte les Requérantes avancent que l'enregistrement du Nom de Domaine par le Défendeur résulte de sa

says is highly distinctive A Google search for STYLIGHT produces references only to the Complainant The generic Top-Level Domain gTLD should be disregarded in the determination of confusing similarity to the trademark The Complainant further

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

Bedford MA is entered into Google maps or Apple Maps a null result is returned Use of false contact information in registering a domain name is evidence of bad faith registration per Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Farouk Systems Inc v Jack King /

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

werden besitzen Auch bei der Google-Suche mit den Begriffen gaam Internet und Werbung würde man als Suchresultat die Gaam Partner AG erhalten Aus diesen Gründen seien die wirtschaftlichen Interessen des Gesuchsgegners nach wie vor sehr hoch und

The Complainant produces a Google search result against the term pixellogo which returns the Respondent's website immediately after that of the Complainant and states that the Respondent's activities are tarnishing the Complainant's trademark

of the first page of Google search results for a search of Green Jacket showing all of the non-sponsored hits as articles referencing the Masters and the Club Complainant also submitted in its Complaint a quote from Respondent s own web