and especially in Europe A Google search on the expression CREDIT AGRICOLE® displays several results all of them being related to the Complainant and its banking activity Moreover the Respondent has not demonstrated any good faith activity in

the domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum January 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent had actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

domain name in bad faith See Google Inc v Eamonn Smyth WIPO Case No D2011-1023 The Panel also notes that as found by other panels where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known product or service its very use by someone with no

term sanofipasteurca in the Google search engine There exists no tangible explanation for choosing this domain name other than to deliberately ride-off the Complainant's reputation The disputed domain name has been registered for the purpose of

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair use

of the Policy see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

is not known by that name See Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in

The first three pages of Google searches for HMKM refer only to Complainant HMKM means nothing other than Complainant in China There are no other trademarks filed for HMKM aside from Complainant s There is no likelihood that the domain name is

of such term and usage A Google search of Isodiol results in the main website for Complainant as the first result in the browser reading Isodiol Pure Natural CBD as well as investment information on Complainant Furthermore the term Isodiol is

worked at companies such as Google and McKinsey The Disputed Domain Name was registered on April 26 2017 At the time of this Decision the website at the Disputed Domain Name resolves to a Registrar parking page According to the Respondent before

trademarks like Dell Google Facebook and Samsung just to name a few Thus the Respondent seems to be engaged in a cybersquatting pattern of conduct As a matter of fact it cannot be inferred that the Respondent is making any legitimate use

Google LLC v Ankita Poonia Claim Number FA1711001757741 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Melissa Alcantara of Dickinson Wright PLLC Washington DC USA Respondent is Ankita Poonia Respondent India REGISTRAR AND

in the first shoppable Google hangout The ASOS group business was started in 1999 by founders Quentin Griffiths and Nick Robertson The business was originally called As Seen On Screen It started off as an Internet enterprise where customers

Paragraph 4 c iii see also Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA 1591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant s GOOGLE mark and Respondent s use of

confusingly similar to HP Google Inc v Manish Kumar / Smith USA / Vikash / Sunil Singh FA 1711892 Forum Feb 17 2017 finding gmailsupportcanada.com confusingly similar to GMAIL Seiko Epson Corp v Asish Sen FA 1702054 Forum Dec 12 2016 finding

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

27 2017 On October 27 2017 Google Inc confirmed by email to the Forum that the oceanstatefarm.com domain name is registered with Google Inc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google Inc has verified that Respondent is

FINDINGS 1 Respondent s googleptv.com googlektv.com and googlegtv.com domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark 2 Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the googleptv.com googlektv.com and

A search for SANGSOM on Google reveals only references to the Complainant's rum The WIPO Overview 3.0 section 3.2.2 states as follows Noting the near instantaneous and global reach of the Internet and search engines and particularly in