Trademarks in conducting a Google search the absence of awareness of the IBIS Trademarks by the Respondent is inconceivable to this Panel and this view is comforted by the evidence of the Respondent s behavior that has registered some 2 273

on search engines such as Google To the best of the Complainant s knowledge the Respondent does not hold any rights in the terms bvlgari and bulgari The Complainant points out that that the disputed domain names all resolve to a website at

Google Inc v Onur Koycegiz Claim Number FA1707001741705 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA Respondent is Onur Koycegiz Respondent Turkey REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED

the translation was done by Google Translate on June 27 2017 The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy the Policy or UDRP the

July 27 2017 On July 27 2017 Google Inc confirmed by email to the Forum that the vitashealth.com domain name is registered with Google Inc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google Inc has verified that Respondent is bound

July 27 2017 On July 27 2017 Google Inc confirmed by email to the Forum that the vitashealth.us domain name is registered with Google Inc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google Inc has verified that Respondent is bound by

purchase of AdWords on the Google search engine 4.3 The Complainant is the owner of many hundreds of trade mark registrations around the world that either comprise or incorporate the term Velux These include United States registered trade mark

redirecting Internet users to Google s India webpage 5 Parties Contentions A Complainant According to the Complainant s website the Complainant is a German industrial group specialized in the fields of high precision drilling reaming mining

July 25 2017 On July 25 2017 Google Inc confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the cerberusacapital.com domain name is registered with Google Inc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google Inc has verified that Respondent is

by a disputed domain name See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 WHOIS information for the at-issue domain name lists Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp as the domain name s registrant and there is

domain name See for example Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum January 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

0119 Hanna Barbera at issue google status.com Hewlett Packard non use elcomlift com postmaster@elcomlift //www l-com ELCOMLIFT COM U S com/ e g info@elcomlift CHEAPTICKETS google-status postmaster elcomlift.com info www.l-com.com is are logo

Company v jack Halua / Google Inc Claim Number FA1707001739643 PARTIES Complainant is The Travelers Indemnity Company Complainant represented by Caroline Ahn of One Tower Square Connecticut USA Respondent is jack Halua / Google Inc

name registration see also Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in

Respondent performed a simple Google search it would have been presented with numerous search results relating and/or referring to Complainant and the existence of Complainant s rights in the FUJITSU mark Respondent apparently failed to discharge

is identical to the name of Google s well-known content streaming device Evidence of such similarity was annexed to the Complaint Complainant is not aware of any use of Groupon in any way other than in connection with Complainant and Respondent

and using the domain name See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum August 10 2015 Likewise Respondent s employment of the contested morganstsnley.com domain name to introduce malware to the computers and devices of

nets profit see also Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA 1605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s use of confusingly similar domain names to offer downloads via video streaming

industry as a complainant See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

as Arla foods and Nigeria on Google engine search all returned results relate to the Complainant and its business activity thus the Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the disputed domain name and would have