has spent over GBP 300 000 on Google AdWords campaigns since 2009 in relation to the mark AWESOME EVENTS and a further GBP 200 000 on other marketing activities The Complainant also provides examples of its clients and refers to industry

confusing similarity See e.g Google Inc v Dzone Inc Yeonju Hong/ Whois Privacy Services Pty Ltd WIPO Case No D2011-1033 Guinness UDV North America Inc v UKJENT WIPO Case No D2001-0684 Likewise the term bg does not change the analysis because the

Name is registered with Google Inc the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on March 6 2017 On March 6 2017 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request

registration and use See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

of the circumstances See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

en el motor de búsqueda Google utilizando el término �lottusse � se desprende que la Demandada no guarda conexión alguna con el referido término ni es conocida corrientemente por el mismo En este sentido la primera página de resultados de

with search engines such as Google and Bing Respondent claims he did not have any knowledge of Complainant s trademark until recently Respondent states he did not receive Complainant s email of September 10 2014 and that one would expect in a

name subsequently directed to Google s cache of http //ritalin-kopen.com/ which invites the user to go to the website www.ritalin-kopen.nl and presently lists websites which inter alia offer drugs under the RITALIN Mark 5 Parties Contentions A

of the domain name with Google G-Suites an attempt by Respondent to bolster the credibility of its mimicry demonstrates bad faith pursuant to Policy Paragraph 4 b iii and/or Policy Paragraph 4 a iv See Zoetis Inc and Zoetis Services LLC v

worldwide as shown by Google searches for BOLLORE and BOLLORE LOGISTICS which show several results all of them being related to the Complainant and its trademarks Prior Panels have confirmed the distinctiveness of the Complainant s

por la Demandante en Google utilizando el término salewa Anexo 4 de la Demanda se desprende que la Demandada que figura inscrita como titular del Nombre de Dominio bajo el nombre de Liu Xuemei no guarda conexión alguna con el referido

the Complainant's business A Google search for the term Schmidt directs Internet users primarily to the Complainant's website and articles regarding the Complainant's business and exclusively to such results for the first two Google pages of the

as a search term in the Google search engine the search is performed for the term cosstores In the absence of any other evidence let alone argument from the Respondent the Panel accepts that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to

http //casellausa.com/ Search Google for casella usa net The Respondent used the Disputed Domain Name in a phishing scheme to falsely claim an association with the Complainant by sending emails impersonating the Complainant and attempting to

in search squibs produced by Google and Respondent has further included blog postings that can be seen in the extended printout of the page entitled How to hire a mobile windshield replacement contractor with an outbound link to a San Diego

use and registration See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Forum Sept 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph4 b iv Capital One

there is no active website f Google search on the term Bollore displays several results all of them being related to the Complainant and its trademarks and g the Complainant has a strong worldwide presence with many locations in the United States

and/or suppliers see Google Inc v Robert Takovich WIPO Case No DMX2012-0006 The email address used to impersonate Complainant's Chief Financial Officer reproduces the structure of the Complainant's official email addresses firstname name

term NUVEEN and according to Google search engine results the term NUVEEN is associated with the Complainant The Complainant adduced evidence of trademark registrations that include Australian trademark registered under no 780627 NUVEEN world mark