is the first hit on many Google search engines when searching for �NetBet � including that of Romania The Complainant is active on social media websites such as Twitter and Facebook The Complainant refers to an extensive advertising program

the domain name a simple Google search would have sufficed is perhaps the most egregious As noted above a reasonable good faith effort by Complainant to verify the alleged facts and assertions by conducting a search on the Internet Archive and

names distinguishable See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

pages of search results on google.com relate to Complainant as evidence of a secondary meaning in its mark See Compl at Attached Annex 5 Complainant also claims gross revenue of over 5 million in 2016 See Compl at Paragraph iii The Panel finds

Biletsky NAF Claim No 1383599 Google Inc v Raffaele Bassano NAF Claim No 232958 and Microsoft Corporation v Paul Horner WIPO Case No D2002-0029 With respect to the Disputed Domain Name aarprewards.com which is being used in connection with a

with Complainant See Google Inc v GOOGLESERVICES Case No FA1105001391118 FORUM July 6 2011 This Panel is satisfied that on the balance of probabilities Respondent s company GOOGLE SERVICES LIMITED never traded and was registered as a sham

Spain are entered into the Google search engine most of the results point to the Complainant or its business activities The Complainant submits that it is not legitimate to register a domain name and use it for a PPC website where such domain

Brocade Software using the Google search engine which it alleges that such reflects that no one other than the Complainant offers software under the Complainant s Mark The Complainant states that its customers are private sector and public

disputed domain name And see Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum March 22 2015 When there is nothing in the record that otherwise suggests r espondent is commonly known by the disputed domain name panels have found

actual knowledge See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

that it has conducted a Google search which it annexes which clearly shows that when one searches for the term My O2 all of the links relate to the Complainant and its O2 or My O2 offering The Complainant states that it utilises the mark MY

search by the undersigned of Google and the Lexis-Nexis database cannot confirm any person by the name Stanley Morgan associated with the other contact information provided in the WhoIs record This leads the undersigned to believe that the WhoIs

because of the toy-related Google search results generated by using the term schleich Therefore it ranks high on Google according to Respondent Respondent states in brief that it is not infringing Complainant s trademark rights Respondent

en el motor de búsqueda Google en relación con superboletos arroja una serie de resultados relacionados directamente con la Promovente Esta prueba demuestra que la marca SUPER BOLETOS sí distingue los servicios que la Promovente presta y

of 100 search results from Google that show inter alia some descriptive uses of the phrase open time in various contexts for adhesives drying time sports events time slots and the like Respondent also refers to a listing in the Google search

know the trademarks a basic Google search of intesa sanpaolo was enough to know that The disputed domain name is not used for any bona fide offerings More particularly there are present circumstances indicating that by using the domain name the

of a disputed domain name See Google Inc v GOOGLESERVICES Case No FA 110500139118 Forum July 6 2011 This Panel is satisfied that on the balance of probabilities Respondent s company GOOGLE SERVICES LIMITED never traded and was registered as a sham

30 2017 On January 27 2017 Google Inc confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the altria-usa.com altriausa.com and altriaglobal.com domain names are registered with Google Inc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names Google Inc

through a search engine like Google is an indicator that the Respondent is taking extraordinary measures to conceal its identity   NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED Rights The Complainant has to the satisfaction of the Panel

25 2017 On January 27 2017 Google Inc confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the biz-tdbank.com domain name is registered with Google Inc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google Inc has verified that Respondent is bound