a portal with links through Google to indicate possible related searches Finally the Respondent s representative states that its client has owned the Domain Name for many years and since it was not ready to use it had parked it with the Registrar

Complainant conducted a Google search for the named Respondent and the Domain Name.  Google reported no match found Complaint Annex 12   It also conducted a search of the USPTO and Madrid Monitor of WIPO records for Respondent as the owner of

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 10 2021 On December 13 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

¶ 4 a iv and otherwise.  See Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant's trademark suggests Respondent's bad faith see also Bittrex Inc v

known by a domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

Twitter Pinterest Tumblr y Google Fotos En la página de inicio de este sitio web se muestra un aviso resaltado de forma destacada encerrado en un recuadro de color rojo indicando lo siguiente AVISO La información contenida en este blog

mark under Policy ¶ 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

14 2022   On January 17 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the gireyco.com Domain Name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by

¶ 4 c iii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 finding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS record

PLAN20 directly through Google Play and Apple App Store links which are included in the website The Respondent explained in its website that it named this app PLAN20 because it provides a health management plan to help pets live up to the age

consisting of maaden A Google search result for the term maaden discloses results relating solely to the Complainant The Respondent is not making a legitimate or noncommercial fair use of the disputed domain name It is inconceivable that the

years Complainant also cites Google Analytics data indicating that the BRAZZERS.com website had approximately 820 000 to 1.39 million daily users in 2019 Complainant owns trademark registrations for BRAZZERS and related marks in the United States

Complainant's mark See e.g Google LLC v Privacy Protection FA 1970877 Forum Nov 30 2021 finding gooqleplay.com confusingly similar to GOOGLE PLAY Google LLC v John Harris / YT FA 1906135 Forum Aug 26 2020 finding gooqle.email confusingly similar

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

is performed on picassol on Google the response first shows try with the spelling picasso The first result refers to the Respondent s website but the second is the Wikipedia page for Pablo Picasso and all the associated searches refer to his life

regard Complainant provided a Google search of aoga showing Complainant s information in the top results Even if Complainant s search is dated 2022 the Panel notes Complainant s longstanding use of AOGA and noting Respondent s acquisition of the

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 29 2021 On November 30 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

all of the results of a Google search of the terms ARCELORMITTAL DE refers to the Complainant Given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademark and reputation and the fact exposed above it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has

mark under Policy ¶ 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

a ping-tree model similar to Google AdWords where the highest available bidder is connected to the consumer Therefore Respondent uses the RISE Mark to divert sales to third party lenders that directly compete with Complainant s product and