as TELCEL SHOP and Mexico on Google engine search all returned results point to Complainant and its business activity The Respondent could easily perform a similar search before registering the Domain Name and would have quickly learnt that the

contradictory information See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum March 22 2015 WHOIS information for the at-issue domain name lists Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp as the domain name s registrant and there is

make such a determination See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

contradictory information See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum March 22 2015 WHOIS information for the at-issue domain name lists Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp as the domain name s registrant and there is

en effectuant une recherche Google pour le terme loceryl note qu auparavant sur le site web disponible à l adresse du nom de domaine litigieux il y avait une annonce de site proposant des contenus pornographiques génériques tels My Clito Tube

at Annex 4 to the Complaint A Google search for VIRGIN MEDIA brings up only results related to the Complainant The Complainant registered the domain name virginmedia.com on February 2 1999 and it resolves to the home page of the Complainant VIRGIN

searches for BP2r on the Google search engine two links on the first page refer to http //pageadviser.com/www.bp2r.com.html which indicates 504 Gateway Time-out The Complainant also states that due to the Respondent registration of the

confusing similarity with the GOOGLE mark under Policy Paragraph 4 a i Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in googleturkiyereklamekibi.com The GOOGLE mark appears on the resolving website but the WHOIS does not identify Respondent as

of confusing similarity See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

same field of business See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

contends that the a Google search for Berlitz yields over four million results the first several pages of which all relate to BERLITZ-branded products and services and a Google search for Algerie demonstrates that the primary significance

VIRGIN MEDIA business A Google search for VIRGIN MEDIA brings up results of Complainant only In addition to virgin.com registered on September 10 1997 and virginmedia.com registered on February 22 1999 Complainant is also the registered

visited URLs such as Google or just part of that word like the letters go it is easy to see how the word wwwgopetplan.com could be entered into a browser It is just the sort of mistake that a frazzled pet owner might easily make when

that several initial Google search results for BIOSPA display information relating to Complainant However although Respondent cites to no dictionary definitions of BIOSPA as a whole Respondent has shown that several third party websites

fide or legitimate use See Google Inc v FORTIS INFOTECH / ASIF FA1210001469446 Nat arb Forum Dec 12 2012 fraudulently acquiring personal information of Internet users is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

listed on the first page of Google search results for the search term Pullman and Comley Compl at Attached Ex G Respondent clearly attempted to lure Internet users to its site by impersonating Complainant and thus did so with actual or

3 there is also a Google Plus Profile from 2013 6 Respondent named his business after the Juniper plant meaning knowledge in Hindy Mythology and therefore closely related to the IT industry where knowledge is the only currency 7

brand is the first hit on the Google search engine when you enter the word Netbet including in Nigeria where Respondent is based and is also the first hit on many public trademark databases Complainant claims that this online presence demonstrates

the company names on the Google search engine The Respondent adds that the essence of registration of the disputed domain names is for the purpose of the bona fide offering of goods and services to existing and prospective customers worldwide