in competitive use See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

details because a search on Google Maps shows that the address for Respondent disclosed by the Registrar does not exist and a search on an international phone validation website reveals that the Respondent s alleged telephone number is invalid by

reported by the media such as google.com and clintonkaine.com for USD 12000 and USD 15000 respectively to justify his acquisition of the Domain Name The Respondent further asserts that the Complainant does not own exclusive rights to the term

with a search engine such as Google leads in the first place to websites relating to the Complainant and its products and as the Respondent is using the disputed domain name in connection with a website featuring the Complainant s products With

in Malaysia in June 2012 A Google search for grab made by the Complainant on August 16 2016 listed a Google applications website of which the description included Grab formerly GrabTaxi/ MyTeksi The distinctive word Teksi together with the

pursuant to Policy 4 a iii Google Inc v Bassano Nat Arb Forum Claim No FA 232958 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content

s customers see also Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Forum September 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph 4 b iv

de Geschillenbeslechter via Google waaruit onder meer bleek dat verschillende hogescholen in Nederland een studierichting Automotive Management aanbieden die opleidt voor managementfuncties op het gebied van financiën commercie organisatiekunde

Google Inc v ERCAN TEKIN Claim Number FA1610001700180 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Melissa Alcantara of Dickinson Wright PLLC United States Respondent is ERCAN TEKIN Respondent Turkey REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED

totality of circumstances See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Google Inc v Ravi Singh Case No DAU2016-0039 1 The Parties The Complainant is Google Inc of Mountain View California United States of America United States represented by Cooley LLP United States The Respondent is Ravi

establish rights in or to the GOOGLE mark per Policy Paragraph 4 a i as it was incorporated fully in the nikegoogle.com disputed domain See also Dell Inc v Ionel Adrian Nicolae FA1607001683104 FORUM August 22 2016 denying relief because the

of the domain name with Google G-Suites an attempt by Respondent to bolster the credibility of its mimicry demonstrates bad faith pursuant to Policy Paragraph 4 b iii and/or Policy Paragraph 4 a iv See Zoetis Inc and Zoetis Services LLC v

4 b iv of the Policy Google Switzerland searches bring up many websites relating to the Complainant products Due to the well-known nature of the Complainant trade mark Internet users will be attracted and confused by the disputed domain

Paragraph 4 c ii see also Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 WHOIS information for the at-issue domain name lists Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp as the domain name s registrant and there is

Inc Nike Innovate C.V and Google Inc v Mattia Lumini / Yykk Snc FA 1687597 FORUM Sept 20 2016 asserting where NIKE and GOOGLE were joined as complainants I t is clear that an objective bystander would conclude that the disputed domain name by

registration and use See Google Inc v Namerental.com and Leonard Bensonoff WIPO Case No D2001-0060 The Panel finds Policy paragraph 4 a iii has been satisfied by the Complainant 7 Decision For the foregoing reasons in accordance with

chain A simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keywords pizza del arte and del arte demonstrates that nearly all results relate to Complainant s websites or business The first result of the United States version of Google

domain name are informed by Google Chrome web browser that the DNS server for the disputed domain name cannot be found and the website cannot be reached The said browser according to the Complainant redirects users to the Complainant s registered

typing the term Facebook in Google s search engine refer to the Complainant The Complainant is the owner of numerous FACEBOOK trademark registrations in many jurisdictions around the world Among these trademarks the Complaint provided details of