had actual knowledge See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 FORUM Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

is registered with Google Inc the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on August 26 2016 On August 26 2016 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

the applicants to use Google Hangouts to participate in the interviews with the Respondent During such interviews the Respondent asks the applicants to provide personal and financial information under the guise of an offer of employment

evidence in the record See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 WHOIS information for the at-issue domain name lists Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp as the domain name s registrant and there is

evidence in the record See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 WHOIS information for the at-issue domain name lists Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp as the domain name s registrant and there is

worldwide as shown by a Google search for Arcelormittal which shows several results all of them being related to the Complainant The Respondent s registration of the disputed domain name amounts to a typosquatting Given the distinctiveness

disputed domain name and a Google search for the disputed domain name returns only the Respondent s infringing website and technical information about same including the WhoIs and DNS information Accordingly Complainant submits that Respondent

Paragraph4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world 4 See Altec Industries

15 2016 On September 16 2016 Google Inc confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the ymcachicago.us domain name is registered with Google Inc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google Inc has verified that Respondent is bound

identical to a mark see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

Paragraph 4 c ii In fact in a Google search the first result when looking for CUBAN TRAVEL NETWORK is Complainant and Respondent s sites appear as a sponsored site Hence it is clear that Respondent is taking advantage of what is known about

de Internet como por ejemplo Google arroja multitud de resultados La Experta considera que a los efectos del primer elemento resulta indiferente que el nombre de dominio en disputa se componga de dos términos de diccionario utilizados

registration and use See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Forum Sept 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph 4 b iv The Panel

in de zoekresultaten op Google De Verweerster stelt dat zij wel degelijk een recht of legitiem belang heeft bij de onderhavige domeinnaam Zij stelt een recht te hebben nu zij de onderhavige domeinnaam als eerste heeft geregistreerd Voorts

by way of a date-limited Google search that reference appears to have been made to the mark AL ARABY AL JADEED in a press release issued by the Complainants on March 30 2014 which included both Figurative Mark 2 and the transliterated name.1

a message purportedly from Google Chrome inviting Internet users to complete a survey and offering chances to become an instant millionaire FOR JUST 1 Another website to which the disputed domain name resolves displays sponsored links allegedly

session being hosted through Google-Hangouts 5 Parties Contentions A Complainant Complaint contends in relevant part as follows The Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the INDEPENDENT HEALTH Trademark because inter alia inclusion of the

name for cover bands A quick Google search conducted by the Panel reveals other bands with the name Radio Flyers located in Kansas City Kansas Las Vegas Salem Oregon Seattle Traverse City Michigan Vancouver and Yonkers New York and a band called

registrations for the GOOGLE mark dating back to 1998 in jurisdictions throughout the world including the United States and India Respondent registered the disputed domain name googlenetmarketing.com in December 2012 It resolves to a

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA 1591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant s