Policy Paragraph 4 c ii See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum March 22 2015 WHOIS information for the at-issue domain name lists Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp as the domain name s registrant and there is

evidence in the record See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 WHOIS information for the at-issue domain name lists Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp as the domain name s registrant and there is

italic fonts A review of a Google search for the phrase world help for pages prior to March 5 2004 yields no results pertaining to Complainant in the top 100 returned In addition Complainant s financial reports for 2003 indicate a total

account on Yelp 2012 and Google Places/Maps 2014 See Additional Submission Annex at Attached Exhibit B Additionally Complainant has evidenced an aggressive promotion of the mark in promotional flyers marketing and advertising materials

on your phone thank you I use Google translate The Center replied to this email informing the Respondent that the language of the proceeding was English as that was the language of the Registration Agreement and indicating the date by which a

translated to English via Google Translate and in original Russian After falsely creating an association with Complainant Respondent is attempting to gather Internet users personal information including the visitors name phone number and device

4 b iv Panels have agreed See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content constituted bad

evidence in the record See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 WHOIS information for the at-issue domain name lists Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp as the domain name s registrant and there is

relation to the Complainant A Google search on the wording ARCELORMITTAL displays various results all of them being related to the Complainant By registering the misspelling of the ARCELORMITTAL trade mark the Complainant argues that the Domain

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

s three factors See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

LTD as Organization See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 WHOIS information for the at-issue domain name lists Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp as the domain name s registrant and there is

includes a copy of a Google search for tn in which references to Complainant do not appear within the first 100 results FINDINGS The Panel finds that each of the disputed domain names is confusingly similar to a mark in which Complainant

Respondent is davd anamo A Google search on this name did not reveal any entry Despite that the fact that no one named davd anamo appears on a powerful search engine as Google is not incontrovertible evidence that this individual does not exist

with a search engine such as Google leads in the first place to websites relating to Complainant and its products It follows from the above that Complainant has already obtained a global reputation Considering the recognition of the SEPHORA

domain name If not a quick Google search would fully enlighten the Respondent This fact is also a strong indicator of the registration in bad faith Finally with respect to the use of the disputed domain name it resolves to an inactive website

When conducting a search on Google for actelion-com.com the results returned are related to the Complainant Results are generated from the Complainant s official site www.actelion.com official LinkedIn profile Facebook Twitter and job

length of time A simple Google search would have revealed information associating the Complainant to the trade mark The content of the Website which has pay-per-click links to shaving products one of the primary products upon which the mark

trademarks of Mozilla Google is a registered trademark of Google Fire-fox.com is in no way associated with Mozilla or Google The disputed domain name fire-fox.com is listed for sale on the Sedo platform b The disputed domain name

s that can be found using a Google Books search The Respondent submits that its registration of the disputed domain name significantly predates the registration date of all the above trademarks by more than 5 years having been created on February