confusingly similar to KINDLE Google Inc v Sunil K iSupport Solution / Aditi Sawant iSupport Solution / Rohit Sharma / Vineet Sharma / Deep / Sunil K FA 1599162 Forum Feb 19 2015 finding gmailsupportonline.com confusingly similar to GMAIL The Panel

Policy Paragraph 4 c ii See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 WHOIS information for the at-issue domain name lists Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp as the domain name s registrant and there is

the Complainant says that a Google search for the words cma-logestics produces results the first page of which relate entirely to the Complainant and its corporate website The Complainant says that the disputed domain name is also similar to its

the Complainant relies on a Google search it has conducted for the words cma-freights and the fact that the first page of the results relate entirely to the Complainant Second the Complainant says that the Respondent does not have any rights or

name he received a standard Google error message Details of an alleged earlier use of the disputed domain name are set forth in Sections 5.A and 6.C below On May 16 and June 2 and 3 2016 the Complainant s counsel wrote cease-and-desist letters to

is registered with Google Inc the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on June 24 2016 On June 27 2016 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request

language and the results of a Google search for mobic are related only to the Complainant s product The Complainant maintains the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name The Complainant explains that the

language and the results of a Google search for mobic are related only to the Complainant s product The Complainant maintains the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name The Complainant explains that the

This ranks the highest in Google search rankings Therefore customers would go to that site first However nothing can be purchased on that website so this may drive customers to choose the Respondent s site next so they can purchase the products

is registered with Google Inc the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on June 30 2016 On June 30 2016 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request

trademark KITCH N by a simple Google search is misplaced as the Complainant does not come up on Google until number 38 on the fourth page and almost every listing shown through a Google search for kitchn is for recipes The Respondent requests the

establish rights in or to the GOOGLE mark per Policy Paragraph 4 a i as it was incorporated fully in the nikegoogle.com disputed domain DECISION Complainant having not established the first element required under the ICANN Policy the Panel

ALASKA AIRLINES mark see also Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in

in Hong Kong China A Google or other search of the second-level domain name jbhifi would have revealed Complainant s substantial commercial Internet operations under its service mark which extend beyond Australia and would have made

to contest A quick check on Google maps was unable to find the address and Complainant could have included this information with its complaint Another check on the post office web site confirmed there was no such address once again something that

cherché à être visible sur Google et à bien se positionner sur la requête parier sur l'esport où son nom figure aujourd'hui en première position alors qu'il est absent des requêtes correspondant aux marques du Requérant Le Défendeur

since it has never used any Google AdSense search boxes on its blogs it has not taken advantage of the maximum allowable number of advertising units according to the Google AdSense policies The Respondent also highlights that a disclaimer of

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings intesa and/or intesa secure the same would have yielded obvious references to Complainant Complainant submits as Annex G to the Complaint an extract of a Google search in

du nom de domaine suivant google.com Le Requérant est aussi titulaire de plus de 180 autres noms de domaine google sous noms de domaine de premier niveau TLD y compris google.ma et google.co.ma Le nom de domaine litigieux a été enregistré

domain name In that regard a Google search the results of which appear in Annex KBL-23 to the Complaint for the name Zeira reveals no entity related to the Respondent In addition online searches made through databases publicly provided by the