par le moteur de recherche Google Annexe 9 de la plainte Les experts UDRP sont par ailleurs d'accord que normalement l'extension com n'entre pas en ligne de compte à cet égard Le Défendeur taisant ne conteste pas ces points La Commission

it has filed as evidence the Google Analytics Audience Overview for policybazaar.com for the period January 1 2015 to December 31 2015 The comparison engine of the Complainant is the result of intense research and periodic updating by a team of

out in South Africa on Google s local South African site and as is well known the results obtained are likely to be influenced by where the search is carried out Different results will be obtained elsewhere as is demonstrated by the

an Internet search and that a Google search leads to the Complainant The Complainant further argues that the Respondent does not use the disputed domain name The Complainant further argues that the disputed domain name was registered and is being

are non-exclusive See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum August 10 2015 finding that the respondent s apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a phishing scheme further established its bad

store such as Complainant See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

and likely profiting see also Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult oriented content constituted bad

C insemer com mx www ingenes google 4 6 2 0 1 c Inc v a

name a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword Michelin would have surfaced first results relating to the Complainant products or news The disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website This state of

media including Twitter t.co Google Inc g.co Amazon.com a.co American Express amex.co and Starbucks sbux.co 3 norcoldboards.com norcoldcoolingunits.com norcoldparts.com norcoldparts.net norcoldpowerboards.com norcoldrepairparts.com norcoldsale.com

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Forum September 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph 4 b iv see

are search results from Google and Bing searches using search terms corresponding to the respective domain names i.e they do not appear to show that the disputed domain names lead to the alleged links but rather that the words within them

of Complainant s famous GOOGLE Respondent s registration of domains incorporating the GOOGLE mark was done in opportunistic bad faith B Respondent Respondent failed to submit a Response in this proceeding FINDINGS Complainant is Google Inc of

Instagram 67500 followers Google and Twitter 6900 followers The Complainant has also registered a number of domain names under generic Top-Level Domains gTLD and country-code Top-Level Domains ccTLD containing the term STAR STABLE see for

do so here But See Google Inc v Java Den Web Solutions FA 1355351 Forum Mar 20 2011 tarnishment usually involves a deliberate attempt to devalue a mark by associating it with things that dilute or damage its commercial value Respondent

submits in this regard that a Google search for the term TM5 will return results overwhelmingly related to the Thermomix TM5 The Complainant argues that each of the disputed domain names reproduces exactly the Complainant s marks THERMOMIX or TM5

purposes pursuant to a Google search and exhibits the result of a Google search which shows inter alia that all but one or two of the entries on the first page relate to the Complainant He says that he acquired the Domain Name for its value

0009 Hanna Barbera at issue google status.com well aware extarbux com GoDaddy postmaster@extarbux EXTRABUX COM ExtraBux ExtarBux U S blcuxiong@gmail Extrabux C americanairliens mapquesrt mapquesat microssoft bobcatequipment ashleyfurnitrue

in 2007 At that time a basic Google search would have revealed Complainant business A search of the USPTO database would have revealed Complainant service mark application for DOLLARBANK.COM.1 In sum a basic Google search would have established

can be downloaded through Google Play for Android users the App Store for iOS users and the Windows Store for Windows users The Complainant claims that there are 70 million downloads of its HIKE Messenger by smart phone users around the world