s prima facie case See Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum August 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected

for betting pools on Google brings up the Complainant s website within the first page of results See in this regard paragraph 3.4 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions Second Edition WIPO Overview 2.0 iii The

Google Inc v Akhil mishra / Prakhar Rastogi / Bestwebexperts.com / Anil singh Claim Number FA1602001660773 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Chantal Z Hwang of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is Akhil mishra

Google Inc v Monika Patel Claim Number FA1602001661784 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Melissa Alcantara of Dickinson Wright PLLC United States Respondent is Monika Patel Respondent Florida United States

Moreover the historical Google searches included in the annexes to the Response RE3 show that there were already links to the Complainant and its trademarks between 1999 and 2000 on the website linked to the Disputed Domain Name Complainant

under Policy Paragraph 4 b iv Google Inc v Sergey Gridasov FA0474816 Nat Arb Forum July 5 2005 concluding that Respondent s registration and use of the disputed domain names to expose Internet users to malicious software constitutes evidence of bad

Google Inc v Pooja Pandey / Innovative Businesss Solutions / Global PVT LTD / Global ITES PVT LTD Claim Number FA1602001660781 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Chantal Z Hwang of Cooley LLP California USA

car lors d une recherche sur google vous apparaissez en première page et nous en troisième page seulement 5 Nous avons acheté légalement ces noms de domaine qui étaient libres Si ils sic vous intéressaient il fallait les réserver Etant une

descriptor for Dubai A simple Google search for Navigant DXB shows that DXB is interpreted as an acronym for Dubai Complainant offers its consulting and other services to clients in the construction real estate development and financial services

correspondence using Google Translate or a similar translation tool and on two occasions sent to Mr Yunhai Jiang screenshots depicting a Google Translate page featuring the Complainant original letter in both English and Chinese Shortly

his name in a search engine Google or other in order to confirm whether Mr Riegert is working for ARP They will then get some search results which look as confirming that there actually is such a connection The email address @arp-deutschland.com

four content partners for Google s new Expert Answers product in the areas of credit cards and mortgages Complainant also has a presence on social media sites such as Facebook www.facebook.com/TheSimpleDollar Twitter

Paragraph4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum August 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world 12 See Altec

generic word or term see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

Google Inc v Md Ashfak Ahmed Khan / Protex Group USA Inc Claim Number FA1602001661652 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Chantal Z Hwang of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is Md Ashfak Ahmed Khan / Protex

Non Verbal Reasoning Test A Google Search conducted on the letters NVRT yields some 141000 results among which the Complainant is not at all prominent and which shows various acronymic uses of NVRT including the ones noted above wherein the Dutch

Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd Claim Number FA1602001660771 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Chantal Z Hwang of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is Pritam Singh / Pandaje

Rentsch a family surname d A Google search of the word rentsch reveals domain names such as rentsch.cz rentsch-ag.ch rentsch.ch soniarentsch.com rentschphotography.com sauter-rentsch.com alexanderrentsch.com familierentsch.ch and

in search engines like Google or Yahoo in respect of united arrows then these would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant and its use of the word combination of united and arrows as a trademark The Panel finds further that the

Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp Claim Number FA1602001660797 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Chantal Z Hwang of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp Respondent